A VC firm is investing from its fifth fund that was closed in 2023. The firm focuses exclusively on early stage and seed investments in medical device companies. The firm provides seed, first, or second round of financing, typically in equity. The initial investment in a company ranges from $250K to $3M, with follow-on financing rounds. Accordingly, the firm invests between $2-6M over the life of an investment. The firm typically invests in companies that are based in the US, but may consider exceptional opportunities abroad. The firm is actively seeking new investment opportunities.
The firm is specifically looking for medical devices that address cardiovascular, orthopedic indications. The firm has no clinical requirements and will invest in design stage. The product must be based on strongly protected IP.
The firm prefers to invest in companies that are not looking to develop their own sales team, but rather developing a technology that can be sold at a healthy premium to a company which already has the requisite sales and marketing teams in place. The firm generally takes a board seat, but is not a requirement. In addition, the firm prefers to assume a role on the company’s scientific advisory board. The firm is looking for companies with a strong and experienced management team.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
The FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (aka CDRH aka the folks who approve med devices) had firings a little more than a week ago, continuing from the layoffs at the NIH and CDC. Early signs indicate a reduction of 10% – 15%. Those who lost their jobs included those funded by medical device user fees and not tax-payer dollars. Since the cuts affected probationary employees the most, recent hires to evaluate newer technologies like AI-assisted imaging and digital health are gone, making it hard to imagine approvals for these modalities would not grind to a halt. AdvaMed’s head, Scott Whitaker, conveyed that AdvaMed had sent a letter to HHS in response, emphasizing the importance of AI and related technologies, the patient-facing effects throwing a wrench in the approval machine would have, and the lack of tax-payer savings. This may have been effective, as in breaking news today, the Associated Press reported that some of the fired individuals received calls and messages reversing their dismissals, stating terminations were “rescinded effective immediately.”
