Tag Archives: food

Advancing Women’s Health Diagnostics Through Glycoproteomics: Proseek Bio at the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge 

3 Feb

Interview with Paula Cerqueira, VP of Scientific Strategy

Proseek Bio is advancing a new approach to women’s health diagnostics by translating cutting-edge glycoproteomics into clinically deployable tools. In this interview, Michelle Hill, CEO of Proseek Bio, discusses the company’s focus on ovarian cancer pre-surgical triage, the unmet clinical needs driving its platform, and how participating in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI JPM shaped investor conversations as the company prepares for global expansion.

Michelle Hill
CaitiCaitlin Dolegowski

Caitlin Dolegowski (CD): For those unfamiliar with Proseek Bio, how do you describe the company and its core technology or therapeutic focus? 

Michelle Hill (MH): Proseek Bio is an Australian diagnostics company focused on women’s health, developing blood-based tests designed to improve how complex conditions are assessed and managed in clinical practice. Ovarian cancer is our first indication, with an initial focus on pre-surgical triage.

Our platform is built on advanced glycoproteomics, integrating multiple protein biomarkers into a single algorithmic score to support clinical decision-making. Rather than relying on any one marker, this multi-analyte approach reflects the biological complexity of disease and enables more informative risk assessment at critical clinical decision points.

What differentiates Proseek Bio is our strong translational focus. The underlying science has been validated through years of academic and clinical research, and we are now converting that work into regulated, scalable diagnostic products for real-world healthcare systems. By targeting earlier decision points such as triage, we aim to support more appropriate referral and intervention, with a longer-term goal of expanding our platform across additional women’s health indications.

CD: What unmet need are you addressing, and why is now the right time for your approach? 

MH: A key unmet need in women’s health diagnostics is the lack of objective tools that reflect real-time disease biology at early clinical decision points. In ovarian cancer pre-surgical triage, clinicians must assess risk using tests with limited biological resolution, which can lead to unnecessary intervention or delayed specialist referral.

Proseek Bio addresses this gap through glycoproteomics, focusing on the glycans attached to proteins that regulate how those proteins function. While genes indicate what could happen and proteins act as messengers, glycan patterns reveal what disease is actively doing in the body. These modifications change early in cancer and cannot be resolved by genomics or standard immunoassays. By integrating glycan and protein signals into a multi-biomarker signature, our tests aim to deliver more informative risk stratification.

The timing is right because advances in clinical mass spectrometry and data analytics have made this biology clinically scalable, enabling integration into existing laboratory workflows and routine care.

CD: What was your experience participating in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI JPM? 

MH: Our first time participating in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI JPM was an energising experience. Pitching to a room filled with sophisticated investors and peers reinforced the importance of clear, disciplined storytelling when presenting complex diagnostic technologies.

As part of the Brisbane Economic Development Agency cohort, we were proud to represent Brisbane’s growing life sciences ecosystem. Beyond the pitch, the table showcase led to thoughtful conversations with investors and fellow founders who were genuinely engaged with both the clinical problem and our translational approach.

Overall, the experience was validating and motivating. It confirmed that our focus on clinically deployable diagnostics in women’s health resonates with a global audience, and it was rewarding to see that reflected in the recognition we received.

CD: Out of 94 Innovator’s Pitch Challenge companies, what do you think helped Proseek Bio stand out to judges and attendees? 

MH: Women’s health remains significantly underrepresented in diagnostic innovation, and that focus clearly resonated with judges and attendees. Ovarian cancer, in particular, represents a high-impact unmet need, especially at early clinical decision points such as pre-surgical triage.

Proseek Bio was the only diagnostics company on the podium, reflecting the distinctiveness of our approach. By applying glycoproteomics to analyse glycan and protein signatures together, we deliver a more biologically informative assessment of disease activity while remaining compatible with existing clinical laboratory workflows.

Importantly, we were able to clearly articulate not just the science, but the pathway to a regulated, scalable diagnostic product. That combination of unmet clinical need, novel biology, and disciplined execution helped differentiate Proseek Bio in a very strong field.

CD: How did RESI JPM impact discussions with investors, partners, or potential collaborators? 

MH: Being recognised on the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge podium gave investors immediate confidence in both the opportunity and the discipline behind the company, and it strengthened engagement with potential partners. Overall, RESI JPM acted as a signal amplifier, reinforcing Proseek Bio’s readiness for global investment and collaboration while accelerating meaningful follow-on conversations.

CD: Where does Proseek Bio currently stand in terms of fundraising, partnerships, or development milestones? 

MH: Proseek Bio is currently completing its Seed round to support development of our first product, OC-Triage. This funding is enabling a clinical study, implementation of a quality management system, and ISO accreditation to support pilot manufacturing, alongside evaluation of OC-Triage with Australian clinical laboratory partners.

In parallel, we are preparing for a Series A focused on U.S. market entry. RESI JPM provided an important opportunity to initiate discussions with U.S.-based clinical and laboratory partners, laying the groundwork for future validation and commercial pathways.

Together, these milestones reflect a transition from technology validation to execution as Proseek Bio advances toward regulated, clinically deployable diagnostics in women’s health.

CD: What upcoming achievements or milestones are you most excited to share with the life sciences community? 

MH: Over the coming year, we are focused on completing the OC-Triage product and establishing pilot manufacturing under an ISO-accredited quality system. These milestones represent an important transition from development to regulated production readiness.

In parallel, we are advancing clinical evaluation with laboratory partners, which will be critical in demonstrating real-world performance and scalability. Together, these steps mark a shift from innovation to execution.

What excites us most is seeing years of science translate into something tangible: a product that can be manufactured, validated, and ultimately used to support better clinical decisions for women.

Interested in pitching your company to a highly engaged investor audience focused on early-stage life science innovation? Applications are now open for the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI Europe. Selected companies receive direct feedback from a dedicated group of investors, access to 1:1 partnering, and visibility with global industry leaders.

Apply to pitch and position your company for meaningful investor conversations.

Apply to Pitch at RESI Europe 2026

Investor Panels at RESI Europe 2026 

27 Jan

By Claire Jeong, Chief Conference Officer, Vice President of Investor Research, Asia BD, LSN

Life Science Nation (LSN) is pleased to introduce the investor panel lineup for RESI Europe, bringing together venture capital firms, family offices, corporate investors, and strategic partners actively funding and partnering across the global life science ecosystem. Designed to reflect how capital is being deployed today, these panels examine what investors are prioritizing, how partnership decisions are made, and what founders need to demonstrate to stand out in an increasingly selective market.

From pharma partnering and preclinical investing to digital health, medtech, and cross-border capital flows, the RESI Europe investor program offers a practical look at how decisions are being made across stages and sectors. Each session pairs candid investor perspectives with real-world expectations founders must meet to advance conversations beyond the first meeting.

Monday, March 23 – Investor Panels

9:00 – 9:50 AM | Pharma Partnering: Getting on Pharma’s Radar
As large pharmaceutical companies increasingly rely on external innovation, early-stage partnerships are becoming a core driver of pipeline growth. This session explores how pharma evaluates emerging science, which data packages resonate with business development teams, and how founders can structure partnership discussions that align with long-term strategic priorities.

10:00 – 10:50 AM | Funding New Science: How VCs Evaluate Preclinical Programs
With capital efficiency under intense scrutiny, therapeutic investors are rethinking how they assess risk and differentiation at the preclinical stage. Panelists will share how they evaluate programs ahead of clinical data, the milestones that matter most, and what founders must show to compete in today’s Series A environment.

11:00 – 11:50 AM | Family Offices: The Rise of the Venture Builder
Family offices have evolved into active healthcare investors, launching dedicated funds and building internal operating expertise. This discussion examines how these groups source deals, lead early-stage rounds, and make investment decisions differently from traditional institutional venture firms.

1:00 – 1:50 PM | Building Investable Medtech: Devices, Diagnostics, and De-risking
Investors in medtech are focused on solutions that combine technical innovation with clear clinical and regulatory pathways. This panel breaks down current investor interest across devices and diagnostics, highlighting the milestones that signal scalability and commercial readiness.

2:00 – 2:50 PM | Digital Health: Moving from Hype to Sustainable Value
As the digital health sector matures, investors are prioritizing solutions with measurable clinical and economic outcomes. Panelists will discuss where capital is being deployed, including AI-driven diagnostics and data platforms, and how companies can demonstrate long-term viability in real-world settings.

3:00 – 3:50 PM | Capital Without Borders: The European Life Science Landscape
Europe’s research ecosystem continues to produce world-class innovation, while investment dynamics increasingly span borders. This session explores how European life science companies can attract international capital, navigate regional differences, and compete on a global stage.

4:00 – 4:50 PM | Backing the First Believers: Deciding to Write the First Check
Pre-seed and formation-stage investors often commit capital before significant data exists, backing teams, vision, and early signals of execution. This panel examines how first-check investors assess founders, build conviction, and help shape companies into institutional-grade opportunities.

These investor panels are designed to foster meaningful dialogue between capital providers and innovators, creating informed conversations that continue beyond the stage and into partnering meetings.

Join the RESI Speaker Lineup
Are you an investor or strategic partner with valuable insights to share with early-stage life science companies? We are looking for dynamic speakers to join our RESI panels. 
Click here to submit your Speaker Interest Form today!

Registration for RESI Europe is now open.
Register with Super Early Bird rates and save €300. Super Early Bird pricing expires Friday, January 30.

Register for RESI Europe

Innovator’s Pitch Challenge Spotlight: Sania Therapeutics and a Controllable Approach to Gene Therapy 

27 Jan

Interview with Paula Cerqueira, VP of Scientific Strategy

Sania Therapeutics is developing a next-generation gene therapy platform focused on treating neurological symptoms driven by dysfunctional neural circuits. At RESI London, the company was recognized as a Third-Place winner in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge and received the highest score from the judging panel, underscoring strong investor interest in its controllable and circuit-specific approach to gene therapy. In this interview, Sania Therapeutics shares its therapeutic focus, differentiated platform, and how participation in RESI has helped shape ongoing conversations with investors and strategic partners. 

Paula Cerqueira
CaitiCaitlin Dolegowski

Caitlin Dolegowski (CD): For those just discovering Sania Therapeutics, how do you describe your company and therapeutic focus?
Paula Cerqueira (PC): Sania Therapeutics is developing a new class of controllable gene therapies designed to treat neurological symptoms driven by dysfunctional neural circuits. Our platform combines localized, low-dose AAV delivery that selectively targets specific neuronal subpopulations with patient-controlled activation, allowing us to precisely modulate hyperactive neurons, improving symptoms without adversely and permanently altering normal neural function. 

Our initial therapeutic target is a motor circuit disorder: spasticity. Our broader goal is to expand into additional motor and sensory indications where current treatment options are limited, invasive, or poorly tolerated. 

CD: What unmet medical need are you addressing, and what differentiates your approach?
PC: Millions of people live with debilitating neurological symptoms such as spasticity and pain disorders, yet existing treatments are often temporary, blunt, or invasive. Oral drugs frequently cause systemic side effects, while interventions like Botox or implanted devices require repeated procedures and provide limited relief. Despite the scale of this unmet need, there has been little meaningful innovation in this area for more than a decade. 

Sania’s approach is differentiated in two key ways. First, our proprietary platform enables selective targeting of the neural circuits that drive disease using localized, low-dose AAV delivery. This approach is intended to support a safer, more sustainable, and more scalable path for gene therapy than traditional systemic delivery. 

Second, our therapy is controllable. Patients can adjust the therapeutic effect using an oral activator, allowing symptom modulation over time. This puts patients in control while enabling precise and flexible therapeutic regulation. 

Our mission at Sania is to bring gene therapy into everyday clinical use by meaningfully improving the lives of people living with neurological conditions. While this is an ambitious goal, for patients who struggle daily with basic activities such as holding a child, we believe this approach has the potential to be truly transformative. 

CD: What was your experience participating in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI London?
PC: Participating in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI London was an extremely valuable experience. The format encouraged clarity and discipline in how we communicated both our science and long-term vision, and the audience questions reflected a high level of engagement from investors and industry leaders. 

Being recognized as a Third Place (First Place among judges in our session) winner among a strong and diverse group of companies was particularly meaningful, and it reinforced that there is a strong interest in approaches that rethink how gene therapy can be applied beyond ultra-rare indications. 

CD: How has the RESI platform influenced conversations with investors or strategic partners?
PC: RESI offered a valuable opportunity to present our work to a broad set of investors and strategic partners and to test our messaging with a highly informed audience. While many groups are understandably focused on later-stage opportunities, the platform helped us refine our positioning and identify areas of alignment for future conversations as the company progresses. 

Following the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge, we also initiated early, informal conversations that we expect to build on as the company continues to mature. 

CD: Where does Sania Therapeutics currently stand in terms of fundraising or partnerships?
PC: Sania Therapeutics is currently focused on advancing its lead spasticity program and platform toward key preclinical and IND-enabling milestones, while continuing to expand the broader platform supporting multiple motor and sensory indications. 

In parallel, we are building relationships with investors and strategic partners aligned with our long-term vision. As the platform matures and data advances, we expect to raise funding to support clinical entry of our lead program and the continued development of additional programs enabled by the platform, and we welcome conversations with groups interested in engaging early. 

CD: What upcoming milestones are most important for the company?
PC: Our near-term focus is on advancing our lead spasticity program across regulatory and manufacturing activities and initiating IND-enabling studies in 2026. Reaching that point will significantly de-risk the program and position us well as we move this innovative approach toward the clinic. 

In parallel, we are making meaningful progress on platform development to support expansion into additional motor and sensory indications. A key goal for the team this year is to validate our first sensory capsid in vivo, leveraging the same delivery and control principles demonstrated in our lead program. 

Applications are now open for the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI Europe. Life science and health tech companies seeking targeted feedback from a dedicated group of coordinated investors are encouraged to apply to participate in interactive pitching, partnering, and one-to-one meetings at RESI Europe. 

Apply to Pitch at RESI Europe 2026

The Needle Issue #22

27 Jan
Juan-Carlos-Lopez
Juan Carlos Lopez
Andy-Marshall
Andy Marshall

As is customary at the turn of the year, we have taken the opportunity to take a look back at financing deals we covered since issue#1, which went live in April last year. Together, these data offer a snapshot of how capital flowed into early-stage, preclinical therapeutic startups in 2025 — and where it did not.

Before diving into the numbers, it is worth qualifying that this analysis captures only publicly disclosed financing rounds, rather than the full universe of early-stage biotech funding. An increasing fraction of preclinical companies now operate in stealth, in part because of fast-moving competition from regions such as China. As a result, the figures presented here likely undercount the true level of early-stage activity.

From the start of our coverage in Q2 2025 through the end of December, we reported 195 preclinical financing rounds. Because Haystack Science focuses on discovery-stage and pre-IND companies, this number excludes financings for assets already in clinical development. Even so, the dataset provides a useful lens on early-stage investor behavior.

Independent industry analyses paint a consistent picture. Multiple sources indicate that 2025 was a year in which venture capital shifted toward later-stage, clinical-stage deals, which were fewer in number but larger in size. This trend was reinforced by ‘Q4 2025 Biopharma Licensing and Venture Report’, presented at the JP Morgan conference. According to JP Morgan, 2025 saw just 191 seed and Series A financings, the lowest total since 2020.

According to the Haystack Science data sample, no venture fund made a series A investment in more than three companies last year (these series A financings ranged from $8–300 million, with a median of $42.5 million). As the deals that Haystack tracks are only the publicly disclosed subset, we expect our sample is skewed to companies that raised larger sums. In the deals we tracked, the most bloated series A ($300 million) went to Cambridge, Mass.-based Lila Sciences, a generative ML model powered startup building “autonomous, closed-loop experimentation using generative ML models to generate drug mechanism hypotheses, test them robotically in the lab with minimal human intervention, and iteratively learn from results.” Lila was backed by megafund Flagship Pioneering and General Catalyst.

21 funds invested in more than one series A round. These were: Arch Ventures, Atlas Venture, Lightstone Ventures, 3E Bioventures, Access Industries/Biotechnology, BGF, BVF Partners, Canaan Partners, Cormorant Asset Management, Dementia Discovery Fund, Eight Roads, Johnson & Johnson Innovation – JJDC, Khosla, Omega Funds, Orbimed, Polaris Partners, Samsara, Santé Ventures, Sofinnova Partners, The Column Group, and Versant Ventures. No fund invested in more than 3 series A investments in last year’s sample.

Further back in the pipeline, we tracked 60 deals. These seed financings—which ranged from $1.1–54.5 million with a median of $10.45 million—were mostly for smaller amounts ($1–$30 million), with a few much larger financing amounts. Overall, 85 different funds, family offices, angels and individuals participated in funding preclinical therapeutic startups in 2025. Of these 85 sources of financing, only 7 financed more than one company. The takeaway from this is that most (>90%) of companies at the seed stage receive funds from a completely unique set of investors.

The 7 financing entities involved in more than one seed deal were: AdBio Partners, Kurma Partners, NRW Bank, Ackermans & van Haaren (AvH), Bioinnovation Institute (BII), ClavystBio and ExSight Ventures. It is noteworthy that two of these funds are based in Paris, France: AdBio Partners and Kurma Partners. AdBio specializes in early-stage investments across Europe with a ~€86 million ($102 million) fund raised in 2021 focusing on oncology, immunology, and rare diseases. Kurma is part of the Eurazeo group, managing >€600 million in assets across several funds focused on early-stage therapeutics and diagnostics.

NRW.BANK, based in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, invests in innovative biotech companies focusing on tech-driven healthcare, bio-digital integration, and novel platforms for data/discovery, aligning with broader innovation goals. They appear to be an important source for the small scattering of financing (13) deals in German-speaking countries. NRW works closely with AvH, an Antwerp, Belgium-based diversified holding company and investment firm, with AvH Growth Capital a proactive investor in early-stage companies like DISCO Pharmaceuticals and Evla Bio.

Another very interesting seed funder is BII in Copenhagen Denmark. The institute provides in-kind grants of up to €3 million for bridging translational studies in European academic institutions. For those projects that progress to a company build, a combination of convertible loans of €500K (Venture Lab) and then €1.3 million (Venture House) are made available to complete seed funding. As of January 2026, BII has supported over 130 early-stage life science and deep tech companies, with many attracting significant external funding. This month, there was news that Novo Nordisk has just plowed another $856 million of funding into BII.

Overall, in terms of the location of where most investment is occurring, our analysis reveals the capacity to host startups is expanding across the globe, with at least 19 countries hosting one preclinical startup that received funding in 2025. These countries were: USA, UK, France, Switzerland, China, The Netherlands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, Japan, Spain, Israel, Australia, Ireland, Norway, Portugal, South Korea and Singapore. Perhaps the prominence of France as a location for preclinical therapeutic startups was most surprising from our sample. Interestingly, a lot of ex-US startups now also have a US (usually Cambridge, Mass.-based) headquarters. Digging deeper, 85 different cities around the world host a startup that obtained financing (pre-seed to series B) in 2025, with 20 cities hosting two or more. As expected, the Boston cluster led with 28 preclinical therapeutic startups, the Bay area hosted 19, and the UK’s Golden Triangle had 13. Of the following pack, some interesting standout cities were Paris, France (with 5 in our sample) and New York City (with 7), the latter long in the shadow of its Boston neighbor.

In terms of the disease areas attracting early-stage investor money, cancer dominates, comprising the focus for 34.4% of the funding raises. This is slightly lower than the biopharma sector as a whole, where cancer comprises up to 45% of pipelines. Following cancer, neurodegenerative disease, autoimmune disease and inflammatory disease all figured prominently. The uptick in deals for companies tackling CNS disorders has been a rolling theme recently, given the burden of neurodegenerative disease and dementia on public health systems and the paucity of disease-modifying treatments. With the continuing stampede around GLP-1s/incretins, there was also a healthy number of metabolic/ endocrine disease startups financed.

One last area we looked at was the type of therapeutic being financed by investment groups. Here again, the pharmaceutical industry’s traditional workhorse, the small molecule, remained pre-eminent in 2025, comprising 24% of financing deals in pre-seed, seed, series A and series B financings that were in the preclinical stage. Established modalities like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were a common focus. And there was a resurgence of interest in recombinant proteins and peptides (likely boosted by the focus on incretins and the metabolic disease and obesity space). Of new modalities, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific and multispecific antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immune cell (T cell and NK cells) also were to the fore, each making up around 6% of all the early-stage deals we tracked. A type of therapeutic gathering increasing attention is clearly the induced-proximity therapeutic sector (including the different flavors of PROTACs, DUBTACs and molecular glues). Finally, although a great deal has been mentioned about investor apathy for gene editing and gene therapy, these also captured 3-4% of the deals.

Winners Announced at RESI JPM 2026 Innovator’s Pitch Challenge 

21 Jan

By Claire Jeong, Chief Conference Officer, Vice President of Investor Research, Asia BD, LSN

RESI JPM 2026 brought together more than 90 innovative life science and healthcare companies over two days, creating one of the most competitive and high-impact RESI conferences to date. A centerpiece of the meeting was the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge (IPC), which provided early-stage companies with a powerful platform to present their technologies, engage directly with investors, and gain visibility within the global life sciences ecosystem.

IPC finalists delivered six-minute pitch presentations, followed by a seven-minute interactive Q&A with a panel of experienced investor judges. Beyond the stage, each participating company showcased its technology at a dedicated table in the RESI Exhibition Hall, enabling deeper conversations during partnering meetings and informal discussions throughout the conference.

A defining element of the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge is its attendee-driven voting model. Registered RESI JPM attendees—including startup executives, venture investors, and industry experts—were given RESI cash at check-in and used it to “invest” in the IPC companies they believed demonstrated the strongest potential. Voting decisions reflected not only pitch performance, but also the companies’ responses during Q&A, one-on-one interactions at their exhibition tables, and follow-up meetings held during the conference.

Life Science Nation is proud to announce the top three winners of the RESI JPM 2026 Innovator’s Pitch Challenge:

1st Place 2nd Place 3rd Place
Oncovita VerImmune Proseek-Bio
Oncovita VerImmune Proseek Bio

Participating companies were organized into 24 sector-focused pitch sessions, each featuring four companies and evaluated by expert judging panels. In addition to the top three overall winners, judges recognized standout companies for exceptional science, compelling business models, and strong execution.

Judges’ Picks:

Looking ahead: Applications are now open for Life Science Nation’s next European conference, taking place in Portugal on March 23, 2026. Companies interested in pitching can apply here. 

Apply to Pitch at RESI Europe 2026

Myonerv: RESI London Innovator’s Pitch Challenge Winner Advancing Stroke Rehabilitation

21 Jan

Interview with Sam Kamali, CEO of Myonerv

Myonerv is developing a new approach to stroke rehabilitation that aims to expand access to intensive, effective therapy beyond the clinic. Following their recent win at the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI London, the team is advancing a wearable neurotechnology designed to help patients regain upper-limb movement through intention-driven stimulation and remote clinical support. We spoke with Myonerv to learn more about the problem they are addressing, their technology, and what comes next as they move toward clinical trials and global partnerships. 

Sam Kamali
CaitiCaitlin Dolegowski

Caitlin Dolegowski (CD): For readers who may be new to Myonerv, how do you describe the company’s mission and core technology?

Sam Kamali (SK): Myonerv is a breakthrough British neurotechnology solution designed to transform stroke rehabilitation through an active, remote-operated wearable medical device that restores movement in patients with post-stroke upper-limb paralysis (paresis). A wearable, non-invasive neurostimulator that helps retrain movement after stroke by detecting a patient’s intention to move and delivering targeted electrical stimulation to augment that movement. This “closed-loop” approach is supported by scientific evidence showing that synchronising stimulation with a person’s voluntary effort can enhance neuroplasticity – the brain’s ability to rewire and relearn lost movements.

Unlike traditional electrical stimulators, Myonerv uses flexible bioelectronic materials to create soft, reusable electrodes that conform comfortably to the arm. The system is designed to be lightweight, easy to apply, and suitable for both clinical and home environments. It will also allow therapists to monitor progress and support patients remotely, helping expand rehabilitation capacity without increasing staff burden.

CD: What problem are you addressing, and why is now the right time for your approach?

SK: Partial paralysis after a Stroke affects 70% of all survivors, approximately 900,000 new patients annually in the UK, DACH and USA. Despite clear evidence that intensive, early, and consistent rehabilitation improves outcomes, most patients in the UK receive only 45 minutes of therapy per day in hospital and as little as 1 hour per week after discharge – far below nationally recommended 3 hours per day. We believe the resulting “plateau” in stroke recovery is not biological, but due to the lack of therapy access and intensity.

Myonerv directly addresses this challenge by developing a first-in-class wearable, closed-loop neurostimulator that enables continuous, intention-driven rehabilitation both in-clinic and at home. It combines bioelectronic sensing, software-assisted control loops, reusable polymer electrodes and remote therapist connectivity (capabilities not currently available in NHS or international markets). The innovation advances beyond the state of the art in its miniaturisation, accuracy, sustainability, and ability to extend clinical rehabilitation into the community setting.

CD: What stood out most to you about competing in—and winning—the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI London?

SK: “It’s so refreshing to hear such a good pitch, after such a long time”. These were the words that stuck with us from our judge, Soyoung Park, General Partner at 1004 Ventures.

This echoed the depth of excitement from investors throughout the event. The judges and audience deeply understood both the clinical problem and the commercial challenge of scaling medical technologies within healthcare systems. People were enthusiastic about the prospect of a remote-controlled rehabilitation device that can exponentially increase the amount of therapy received by patients. Winning wasn’t just validation of the technology - it was validation of the need and our ability to change the state of healthcare worldwide.

CD: How has the exposure from RESI London impacted conversations with investors or strategic partners so far?

SK: RESI London has materially accelerated conversations. Since the event, we’ve seen increased inbound interest from international investors and strategic partners across Europe and the US, particularly those focused on neurotechnology, digital health, and rehabilitation.

The win has acted as a strong credibility signal – shortening diligence cycles and shifting discussions toward clinical milestones, regulatory strategy, and partnership structures rather than basic validation. It has also opened doors to potential manufacturing and healthcare delivery partners who see Myonerv as an international platform, not just a single product.

CD: Where is Myonerv currently in terms of fundraising or partnership strategy?

SK: We have officially opened a £2 million pre-seed priced round. Our strategy is to combine the £215k in non-dilutive funding with targeted private investment to de-risk the technology before scaling. What is promising is that we are receiving non-dilutive funding faster than we can announce it, with a recent admission into the Founders Factory x Innovate UK (Hospital to Home) Biomedical Catalyst Accelerator, which enables a£100k grant for us to perform our first in-patient trials.

This touches on our recent partnership arrangements, as we are working closely with several patient networks and the Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Foundation Trust (CPFT), an NHS Trust overseeing hospital networks across the East of England. CPFT has agreed to sponsor our clinical trials, which fast-tracks the process for trial approvals, recruitment and secure documentation of data. CPFT has shown great enthusiasm in being our first pilot sites for Myonerv. This is only a small part of our partnership arrangements, as we have several more with other hospitals across the UK who have given us Letters of Interest to give Myonerv to 1,200 patients per year once the device is available in the market.

We are now looking to build on the network we have built in Cambridge thanks to the £120k grant won from ARIA as part of Cambridge NeuroWorks, tasked with developing a first-in-class scalable neural interface for the world. Our next step is to visit RESI JPM in San Francisco on January 12th 2026 to create more partnerships with the US network as we look to expand our reach globally.

CD: What milestones are you most focused on over the next 12–18 months?

SK: Our primary focus is delivering on the tech. We are currently finalizing our functional prototype with the Manufacturing Technology Centre, a major UK-based factory, to test on participants with approvals from the University of Cambridge. Our shiny new prototype will be ready in time for an exciting Myonerv demo at RESI Europe in Lisbon, on 23rd March 2026!

We are then looking to build on this to develop a TRL6/7 alpha device and completing a feasibility clinical study in stroke survivors. In parallel, we are advancing our regulatory pathway, quality management systems, and health-economic evidence to support adoption by healthcare providers. Having secured regulatory and commercial partners who will help navigate our pathway through into international markets.

We are simultaneously focused on strengthening manufacturing readiness, expanding our clinical and patient engagement network, and closing our pre-seed round. Together, these milestones position Myonerv for scale - clinically, commercially, and globally.

Apply to Pitch at RESI Europe 2026

RESI JPM Innovator’s Pitch Judges Announced 

6 Jan

By Momo Yamamoto, Senior Investor Research Analyst, LSN

RESI JPM brings together early-stage life science innovators and active investors during one of the industry’s most important weeks, and Life Science Nation is pleased to announce the investor judges participating in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge (IPC).

This year’s IPC will feature more than 90 presenting companies across 24 pitch sessions over two days, offering startups a high-impact opportunity to gain visibility, pitch directly to investors, and receive real-time feedback from experienced decision-makers.

Each pitch session will be evaluated by a panel of investor and strategic partner judges with expertise spanning therapeutics, medical devices, diagnostics, digital health, and life science tools. Following every presentation, judges will lead a live Q&A to assess the opportunity and share perspective on scientific differentiation, commercial potential, and investment readiness.

All IPC companies will also be assigned a dedicated space in the RESI Exhibition Hall, creating additional opportunities for follow-up conversations and deeper engagement with investors and conference attendees.

In addition, RESI JPM attendees will be invited to vote with their RESI Cash for their favorite presenting companies. The Top 3 companies will be announced during the conference reception. Winners will receive a prize and be featured in an upcoming issue of the LSN newsletter, reaching a global audience of investors and life science innovators.

Scroll down to see which investors will serve as judges for this year’s RESI JPM Innovator’s Pitch Challenge.

Smriti-Agrawal
Smriti Agrawal
TiE Angels
Christopher-Aleong
Chris Aleong
BioIdeations
Ibraheem-Alinur
Ibraheem Alinur
2Flo Ventures
Jolene-Anderson
Jolene Anderson
VectorPoint Ventures
Ali-Ardakani
Ali Ardakani
Novateur Ventures Inc.
Dylan Attard
Dylan Attard
Ikigai Ventures
Zachary-Betts
Zachary Betts
Zandia Ventures
Kumar-Bhargava
Kumar Bhargava
PharmaCatalyst
Benjamin-Chen
Benjamin Chen
Panacea Venture
Jenna-Chow
Jenna Chow
HKSTP Venture Fund
Michael Christensen
Michael Christensen
Prometheus Medical Ventures
Bruce-Cohen
Bruce Cohen
Xeraya Capital
Patrick Cooke
Pat Cooke
Merck Digital Sciences Studio
Anne-DeGheest
Anne Degheest
HealthTech Capital
Yizhen-Dong
Yizhen Dong
Raise Health
Karen-Drexler
Karen Drexler
Astia Fund
Linda-Elkin
Linda Elkins
W47 Angels
Bettina-Ernst
Bettina Ernst
BERNINA BioInvest
Idong-Essiet-Gibson
Idong Essiet-Gibson
She’s Independent
Larry-Florin
Larry Florin
Eckuity Capital
Karim-Galzahr
Karim Galzahr
OKG Capital
Dimitra-Georganopoulou
Dimitra Georganopoulou
Qral Ventures
Gary-Gershony
Gary Gershony
BayMed Venture Partners
Lucien-Ghislain
Lucien Ghislain
Life Science Angels
Kristin-Gleitsman
Kristin Gleitsman
Fellows Fund VC
Navin-Govind
Navin Govind
Evidence Ventures
Joe-Hanssen
Joe Hanssen
Osterbury Capital
Isaac-Haq
Isaac Haq
HINA Bioventures
Lindsay-Hoover
Lindsay Hoover
JLS Fund
Elena-Itskovich
Elena Itskovich
Nest Catalyst
Sherry Jiang
Sherry Jiang
Genertec America,Inc
Jacob-Johnson
Jacob Johnson
Laerdal Million Lives Fund
Mo-Kagalwala
Mo Kagalwala
NuFund Venture Group
David-Katz
David Katz
Angel Investor
Danil-Kislinskiy
Danil Kislinskiy
GGW Ventures (Go Global World)
Maria-Kondratyev
Maria Kondratyev
Phoenix Gate Ventures
Matthew-Konneh
Matthew Konneh
Atheneos Ventures
Rebecca-Lin
Rebecca Lin
Stanford Angels and Entrepreneurs
Ken-Lin
Ken Lin
ABIES Capital
Karen-Liu
Karen Liu
3E Bioventures
Wojciech-Majewski
Wojciech Majewski
Global Health Impact Fund
Nune-Martiros
Nune Martiros
Paladin Capital Group
Dana-Matzen
Dana Matzen
CTI Life Sciences Fund
Ray-Minato
Ray Minato
INERTIA Product Development
James-Murray
James Murray
ExSight Ventures
Naoki Nagakura
Naoki Nagakura
Teikoku Ventures, Inc. (TVI)
Pejman-Naraghi-Arani
Pejman Naraghi-Arani
Biomedical Advanced R&D Authority (BARDA)
Ken-Nelson
Ken Nelson
Medtech Advantage Fund
Tam-Nguyen
Tam Nguyen
Horizon 3 Biotech
Andrew-Offer
Andrew Offer
Scientific Health Development Partners (SHD)
Ying Ou
Ying Ou
Life Science Angels
John-Pennett
John Pennett
Mid Atlantic Bio Angels
Leonard-Pickard
Leonard Pickard
JLS Fund
Pablo-Prieto
Pablo Prieto
CG Health Ventures
Bikash-Rajkarnikar
Bikash Rajkarnikar
Haleon
Reza-Sabahi
Reza Sabahi
Tellaro Capital Partners
Julie-Schafer
Julie Schafer
Flu Lab
Roman Schenk
Roman Schenk
INOGROUP
Laly-Scherf
Laly Scherf
I-Next Capital
Jordan-Schultz
Jordan Schultz
Pacific Bridge NY
Claire-Smith
Claire Smith
Springtide Investments
Zane-Starkewolfe
Zane Starkewolfe
WuXi Biologics Healthcares Venture
Eran-Steinberg
Eran Steinberg
Imaging Arts
Stephanie-Steltzer
Stephanie Steltzer
University of Michigan – Michigan Biomedical Venture Fund
Timothy-Sung
Timothy Sung
Esplanade HealthTech Ventures
Prasad-Sunkara
Prasad Sunkara
Seed to Fruit Fund
Mark-Tang
Mark Tang
Good Health Capital
Kristin-Thompson
Kristin Thompson
Mérieux Equity Partners
Guillaume-Thoviste
Guillaume Thoviste
Mérieux Equity Partners
Paola-Torre
Paola Torre
Life Science Angels
Megha-Unhelkar
Megha Unhelkar
Connecticut Innovations
Santhosh-Vadivelu
Santhosh Vadivelu
AdimaBio
Tom-Vogelsong
Tom Vogelsong
K2X Capital
Nicole Wang
Nicole Wang
Intuitive Surgical
Sally-Wang-Liang
Sally Wang Liang
Xpanse Venture
Robert-Warren
Robert Warren
Hamamatsu Ventures
Jason-Weshler
Jason Weshler
Siemens Healthineers
Jim-Wu
Jim Wu
SaniMed Science Group
Wei Xiao
Wei Xiao
Lipos Healthcare Investment
Jun-Xiao
Jun Xiao
Life Science Angels
Deborah-Zajac
Deborah Zajac
SOSV
Rosanna-Zhang
Rosanna Zhang
Coho Deeptech
Adam Zha
Adam (Chunlin) Zhao
Anlong Medical Fund
Don-Zinn
Don Zinn
Crossject
Register for RESI JPM 2026