By Dennis Ford, Founder & CEO, Life Science Nation; Creator of RESI Conference Series
RESI’s partnering platform is unique in its ability to filter and sort through investor and company profiles, allowing both companies and investors to find partners who are match for them. The partnering system increases the value for attendees participating in our events, eliminating wasted meetings discovering that you are not a fit for each other.
As an example, one of our fundraising CEOs, who has a blood-based technology in an orphan indication, asked us to look up investors who are interested in diseases affecting the blood, in combination with those investing in orphan diseases. At this up and coming Digital RESI event next week we found that of the 250 investors that 141 will look at investing in therapeutics treating diseases of the blood, presenting a terrific opportunity to connect with quite a few investors interested in that space. But there are subtleties here, because investors come in several flavors: those who are very specific in their investment interests, of which we found 37, and those who are opportunistic, 104 investors who seek compelling technology and look more broadly at the early technology assets that surface on their radar screen.
However, the benefit to companies improves greatly by employing the LSN Investor database in addition to participation in RESI events. Doing the same search in the Investor Platform yields 1439 investors interested in therapeutics treating blood diseases. It is even possible to narrow that down further, with a result of 311 investors that are interested in therapeutics treating orphan blood disorders. This kind of granularity is what makes LSN’s services so powerful, and so useful.
By Claire Jeong, Vice President of Investor Research, Asia BD, LSN
As many readers know, LSN organized its inaugural digital RESI “Europe” conference last month. RESI had a digital agenda in place, which included various panels & workshops, Innovation Challenge finalists, and Featured Company Pitch Sessions. One of the panels LSN organized was “Big Pharma”, a popular session that is included at almost every RESI conference.
Large pharmaceuticals continue to play a key role in the early-stage biotech ecosystem by actively scouting and fostering external innovation, orchestrating various types of partnership models to work with novel science. Last year, there were notable partnerships such as Gilead’s deal with Goldfinch Bio for their kidney disease pipeline, or Roche’s deal with Skyhawk Therapeutics for developing small molecule therapies that modulate RNA splicing, in CNS and oncology. For an emerging startup, the implications of partnering with global pharma are tremendous and they are always highly sought after at RESI.
So how can people successfully engage with global, large pharmaceutical groups? For many companies, the entire process may seem daunting. The Big Pharma panel organized at the last RESI covered perspectives of various organizations, represented by the following panelists:
Arpita Maiti, Executive Director & Global Head, Inflammation & Immunology, ES&I,Pfizer
Chris Church, Manager, Search & Evaluation, CVRM, AstraZeneca
Mark Day, VP Research & Emerging Sciences, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals
Elena Ritsou, Global Head Oncology Business Development, Ipsen S.A.
Some key takeaways:
Having the whole package – great science, management team, supporting materials. All groups really are open to companies of all stages of development, as long as the science they are working on is compelling. Most of the represented groups are open to considering various types of modalities, while Ipsen has more focused interests, mainly focusing on small molecule therapeutics. Some groups delved into more specific technology areas of interest, such as Pfizer’s expertise and research into nanoparticles and AstraZeneca’s interest in technologies that increase oral bioavailability of peptides.
As long as the company is supported by a clear and well-organized pitch deck and other supplementary materials, you can expect a positive initial response. It is also important to note that pharmaceuticals want to work with management teams who are willing to listen and adapt to their constructive feedback, meeting suggested timelines, etc.
Identify the right people to reach out to. Business units are organized based on therapeutic area. Colleagues who are responsible for business development and external research/collaboration attend many partnering conferences beyond BIO and JPM. Of course, pharma also regularly participate in major scientific conferences such as AACR, so it is not difficult to find a representative from a pharma you are seeking to engage. Main communication is done through e-mail, so you can e-mail a contact you have recently met at a networking event or conference, or start a new outreach by navigating through the pharma’s partnering webpage.
Try to identify the right person to contact, instead of reaching out to the CEO or key senior executives from the start (unfortunately, this seems to happen more often than it should). Even if you do reach out them, the opportunity will trickle down to the appropriate business unit, not only making this an inefficient process for everyone involved but also leaving a bad impression. Arpita from Pfizer mentioned that it would take 1-2 weeks to get back, which sounds like a standard timeline for others as well.
Understanding creative partnership & collaboration models. Global pharmaceuticals are all taking novel approaches to identify and support early-stage technologies, and they value the importance of open collaboration. It would be a good idea to properly research into the big pharma partners with whom you are most keen to establish better connections. Many pharmaceuticals have established corporate venture funds to invest in technologies that have synergies with the pharma’s current R&D pipeline. On this panel, every pharma has their own venture funding platform with the exception of AstraZeneca. Other approaches can include partnering with existing assets in pharma’s platform and engaging in a research collaboration or non-dilutive funding-type of deal, option-type agreements, etc. An example is Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation (CTI), through which Pfizer collaborates with investigators and academia to accelerate promising research.
So when is an opportunity “too early”? There is no absolutely right answer to this question, as people have different perspectives in evaluating opportunities. But, most can agree on the fact that when an early-stage opportunity is dismissed and comes back later when there has been further clinical development, the deal will become more expensive and complicated to negotiate. Mark from Otsuka noted that simply telling companies to come back when they have proof of concept or better data is just an easy way out. If he identifies a compelling opportunity, he will find someone else in the company who could share the excitement and build a case. Elena from Ipsen mentioned that, as they have ceased in-house research in oncology and rare disease, they tend to partner with and have the capacity to engage at the candidate development stage. They don’t shy away from the earliest stage opportunities, engaging in option-type agreements and supporting companies during this period to get them to candidate development stage and beyond (i.e. in-licensing).
By Gregory Mannix, Chief Conference Officer, Vice President International Business Development, LSN
The all-digital format is changing the way companies are showcasing themselves and drawing attention investors that are a fit for their stage development and product. RESI offers an inexpensive and compelling way to gain exposure via its Featured Company Forum. A company can enhance their global footprint by putting up their company information on a dedicated landing page. This Featured Company Page can host a video, Executive Summary, PowerPoint, Poster Board or Tear Sheet which can easy be found by an interested potential partner.
Each logo will be clickable so attendees can view the Featured Company’s dedicated pages. There will also be a link on each Featured Company page that enables attendees to quickly request a meeting with the company on the RESI Partnering Platform. LSN wanted to dedicate space at Digital RESI to feature early stage life science companies in order to give regional-based firms some global reach at events that are bringing global investors and strategic partners seeking technology assets. Think of it…global reach from your home office!
A corporate venture fund invests strategically on behalf of the parent company, which has a global presence. The firm is interested in life science opportunities globally, and expects to make 3-4 new investments per year. The firm typically invests about $10 million over the life of an investment. The fund is typically a lead investor, and participates in syndicates with other investment firms. The firm does not attach rights or options to equity investments; the fund’s allocations are ‘no strings attached’. The firm considers opportunities globally but focuses on Europe, Middle East and North America.
The firm is strategically mandated to invest in opportunities with therapeutic platform technologies. The firm is only interested in novel technologies; while the fund will consider investing in any form of therapeutic technology, regenerative medicine, cell therapies and gene therapies are the areas of greatest interest. The fund is focused on investing in oncology (particularly immuno-oncology), but will also consider opportunities in other indication areas. The firm generally invests in preclinical assets.
The firm invests in technologies of strategic importance to the corporate. The firm only invests in privately held companies. The firm typically does not invest in single asset opportunities; only companies with multiple pipeline assets are of interest. The firm is often the first outside investor in a company, and prefers to invest in opportunities where the firm’s allocation can secure a meaningful stake in the company (a board seat is a requirement).
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email mandates@lifesciencenation.com.
A venture capital and private equity firm invests in breakthrough industrial technologies and, within the life sciences, is looking to invest in companies developing R&D and manufacturing tools and services. The firm is interested in companies that have at least some data through a pilot or a pharma partner to validate their technology. The firm invests primarily in North America-based companies, but will consider international companies that have significant operations in the US.
The firm invests in tools and services for R&D and manufacturing within the life sciences. This can include diagnostics platforms, AI/ML based drug discovery platforms, analytics or manufacturing tools. The firm invests primarily in technologies that do not require FDA approval, and looks for companies with some data validation of their technology with an external partner.
The firm prefers to lead and take a board seat when investing, but will occasionally co-invest as well. The firm will also consider follow-on investments.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email mandates@lifesciencenation.com.
A venture capital firm based in USA, with a partner in China that can provide support to companies interested in China market entry, has great experience with working with regulatory agencies to gain product approval for both FDA and CFDA. Since its establishment, the firm has invested in over 30 companies and continues to actively seek life science investments, aiming to invest in 8-10 companies per year. The firm usually participates in seed to series B financing rounds with check sizes between $500K – 2M and will consider companies based in USA and China.
The firm is opportunistic and will consider all early-stage opportunities in therapeutics, medical devices, diagnostics, and digital health, as long as the technology is considered highly disruptive. The firm’s greatest focus lies in the medical device sector in which the firm has the strongest expertise. In therapeutics, the firm will consider pre-clinical and phase I assets. In medical devices and diagnostics, the firm is open to all classes of medical devices including 510k and PMA that are in development or clinical trials. The firm has reviewed companies of various stages in the past: those that have just developed a valid prototype, and those that were already profitable prior to investment.
The firm seeks to work with companies with an experienced management team, ideally led by a serial entrepreneur with a successful track record. The firm can both lead and co-invest but prefers to lead financing rounds for medical device companies and will most likely take a board seat.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email mandates@lifesciencenation.com.
Founded in 2019, a Chinese venture capital firm specialized in the growth-stage life science investments and IT area. Currently, the firm has ~300 RMB assets under management. While generally being flexible on the allocation size, the firm typically makes investments ranging from 10-60 MM RMB (~1.4-8.5 MM USD).
The firm has strong interest in investing novel pharmaceuticals, including orphan drugs. Also, the firm is open to digital health, especially the ones has big data application in life science area. So far, the firm has no interest in diagnostics nor medical devices products.
The firm prefers companies with China Angle, especially the ones open to register an entity in China.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email mandates@lifesciencenation.com.
The firm is focused on therapeutics companies and does not invest in medical devices, diagnostics, or digital health. The firm is open to considering assets of very early stages, even those as early as lead optimization phase. The firm considers various modalities, including antibodies, small molecules, and cell therapy. Currently, the firm is not interested in gene therapy. Indication-wise, the firm is most interested in oncology and autoimmune diseases but has recently looked at fibrotic diseases and certain rare diseases as well.
The firm is opportunistic across all subsectors of healthcare. Within MedTech, the firm is most interested in medical devices, artificial intelligence, robotics, and mobile health. The firm is seeking post-prototype innovations that are FDA cleared or are close to receiving clearance. Within therapeutics, the firm is interested in therapeutics for large disease markets such as oncology, neurology, and metabolic diseases. The firm is open to all modalities with a special interest in immunotherapy and cell therapy.
A strategic investment firm of a large global pharmaceutical makes investments ranging from $5 million to $30 million, acting either as a sole investor or within a syndicate. The firm is open to considering therapeutic opportunities globally, but only if the company is pursuing a market opportunity in the USA and is in dialogue with the US FDA.
The firm is currently looking for new investment opportunities in enterprise software, medical devices, and the healthcare IT space. The firm will invest in 510k devices and healthcare IT companies, and it is very opportunistic in terms of indications. In the past, the firm was active in medical device companies developing dental devices, endovascular innovation devices, and women’s health devices.
A venture capital firm founded in 2005 has multiple offices throughout Asia, New York, and San Diego. The firm has closed its fifth fund in 2017 and is currently raising a sixth fund, which the firm is targeting to be the largest fund to date. The firm continues to actively seek investment opportunities across a […]