Tag Archives: health

Hot Investor Mandate: Early-Stage VC Focused on Deeptech Innovation, Investing in Platform and Enabling Technologies from Pre-Seed to Series A

5 Aug

An early-stage venture capital firm focuses on deeptech innovation, with strategic emphasis on the Cleantech and Biotech sectors. The firm acknowledges the critical role that advanced materials play in promoting both planetary and human health. 

The firm typically invests from Pre-Seed through Series A, with average initial allocations around USD $500k and reserves for follow-on participation. Geographically, the firm targets North America and Asia, and is also open to public-ready companies or those preparing to go public. 

Within biotech, the firm seeks novel therapeutics and global health-enhancing medical breakthroughs. While broadly sector-agnostic, the firm prioritizes companies with a technology backbone. Preferred areas include: platform technologies, enabling tools for drug discovery & development, and synthetic biology 

The firm is indication-agnostic, though generally less interested in infectious diseases. 

There are no strict team or company prerequisites, though the firm prefers to have an investor presence on the board. 

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com

Hot Investor Mandate: Canada-Based VC Invests in AI-Driven Technologies Including Medical Devices, Diagnostics, and Digital Health Across the Globe

5 Aug

A venture capital corporation is based in Canada with the government serving as a limited partner participates in Angel through Series A rounds, typically allocating CAD $100K to $200K for Angel rounds and CAD $500K to $1M for Pre-A and Series A rounds. It is open to co-investments and occasionally acts as a limited partner in other investment funds. The firm seeks innovative projects that align with the interests of its affiliated operating company, which specializes in immunology-based diagnostics. 

In addition to direct investments, the firm in-licenses intellectual property from universities and engages in joint ventures with other partners. With its own internal management and engineering team, the firm plays an active role in helping startups enter the market and commercialize their products. The firm is open to working with companies globally. 

Its core areas of interest include AI-driven digital health, medical devices, and diagnostics – particularly those involving antigen and antibody pairs. The firm favors companies that are nearing commercialization and can be integrated into its existing AI platform. A board seat is typically preferred in investments. 

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com

Pullan’s Pieces #4 – China, Japan, Europe, Korea vs US- Collaborate or Compete?

5 Aug

As a deal maker, where should I go for a deal?  Where is my competition?

There is so much written about China, I thought I would try to put it in the context of other countries.

DEMOGRAPHICS:  China is Big but low GDP per capita, Japan has the oldest population.  Both Japan and China may have reached peak population, while the US has immigration to continue growth.  China and Japan have more big cities (making clinical trial recruitment easier).

The Medical Culture varies tremendously.  

The US, with the 3rd largest population and private insurance, has the biggest market

But there are even bigger differences in the magnitude of sales of new drugs. In the US, to be in the top 10 in 2031 means double digit billions.

The biggest company R&D budgets per company are in “Global companies”.

The biggest European and Japanese companies have become global companies. 

The biggest companies in the US have 45%-70% of their Rx sales in the US.

The biggest companies in Europe have 15%-30% of their Rx sales in Europe.

The biggest companies in Japan have <10% (Takeda) to 39% of their sales in Japan. (Smaller Japanese companies have most of their Rx sales in Japan)

The biggest Chinese companies have 80-95% of their sales in China.

2024 saw a surge in approvals: In 2024, China first-approved 93 innovative drugs, with 42% being domestically developed. But China is losing domestic market share to MNCs.

The biggest Korean companies with biologics (Samsung and Celltrion) have 10-20% of their sales in Korea.  The other big Korean companies have 70-90% of their Rx sales in Korea.

But China has almost as many drugs in Phase 1 thru 3 as the US, in almost as many companies as in the US.  

There are more companies getting series A in the US and in China but the dollar amount is smaller in China. 

The US leads in IPOs

But the Hong Kong Hang Seng Biotech Index was up 87% year to date (while the US XBI was down 6%).  

Europe is active in company acquisitions, but Asia is not.  

For companies with headquarters in the US, Europe, Japan and Korea:  most partnering deals are early and with more in-licensing than out-licensing. 

China does more out-licensing than in-licensing.  

So as a deal-maker, what do I think this data suggests?

1)  You need to capture value from the US, the biggest market and home of blockbusters.

2) US companies do the most in-licensing. US and Europe do the most M&A.

3) The most deals in 2024 and 1st Half of 2025 are still done at discovery and preclinical.

4) Japanese companies are increasingly global companies and do more in-licensing than out-licensing.

5)  China is a source of drugs to bring in, with many drugs in the pipeline and new series A companies needing partners to maximize their value. China does more out-licensing than in-licensing.  Presumably, the huge China vs China competition is pushing Chinese companies to innovate more to compete and to do deals.   And more exits (IPOs and M&A) encourages more VC funding of innovation.

6)  But the low cost and the high populations cities (for fast recruitment) means China should be considered for collaborations for your drug development.  (Just remember you need 20% of patients in the US for FDA approval).

7) Korea is a high-income market but small.  In-licensing deals are often early or at market stage.

Pullan’s Pieces #3 – January – A Corner on Market Sentiments – Seed to Series A

29 Jul

As the saying goes, “What’s in a name? That which we call a Series A by any other name would smell as sweet.” Er… something like that, right? Hmmm, maybe it went a little bit differently.

But whatever it be, or not to be😊, the Seed Round is the new Series A. Clearly. I think we’ve all felt it for sometime but the data is in and the good ‘ole Series A just don’t buy what it used to. Nahhh… the Seed round does that, and it may buy more (equity) than it used to as a Series A (more data hunting and crunching required but one gets a sense that the venture capitalists are, well, capitalizing).

Labiotech does a really nice job collecting and summarizing a variety of topics related to financings and dealmaking in the biotech sector and the 2024 breakdown of funding offers the following approximations (roughly, with some rounding made by this author):

The internal breakdowns for amounts invested look like this:


Readers of this corner will know that we keep a close eye on the XBI

As usual, the outliers can skew the numbers (more on this in a moment) but the median amounts invested into these rounds puh-rihhhty much drive the nail in the coffin of the old thinking about Series dynamics. This data could be charted in another way in which an inverted bell curve would appear and a GAPING hole between $20M and $50M would stare back at you. Think about that for a moment… if you can’t get to value inflection for ~$15-20M, you better be raising $60-75M and have multiple reasons to do so as a cursory view of the companies listed in the dataset further indicates that the lower outliers (sub-median) on the Series A were generally geared for “finding out” about a single asset in the clinic.

Back to that previously mentioned outlier that can skew the averages… it also happens to bring even more of a spotlight to those famed words from Shakespeare which began this Corner on Market Sentiments. One of the companies in the 2024 data set raised a whopping $100,000,000 … as a Seed Round!! Indeed, a rose by any other name…

Hot Investor Mandate: VC Firm Headquartered in Asia Makes Early- to Expansion-Stage Investments Into Digital Healthcare Companies With Asia Market Potential 

29 Jul

A venture capital investor based in Asia with a presence in the US makes early- to expansion-stage investments across multiple sectors, ranging from smart cities and fintech to healthcare. Investment size is highly variable depending on the company’s stage. The firm invests alongside other venture capital firms in companies located in North America and Europe that have a market expansion strategy into Asia. 

The firm takes an opportunistic approach to digital healthcare companies, particularly those leveraging AI and bioinformatics to accelerate the drug discovery process. 

The firm seeks entrepreneurs who are passionate, driven, and enthusiastic, with sustainable business models and globally scalable ideas. 

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com

Hot Investor Mandate: Venture Arm of Investment Bank Seek Therapeutics and Medtech Companies in CNS, Oncology, and More, Focusing on US Based Opportunities

29 Jul

An investment bank headquartered in the US  does not act as a traditional investment bank, as the firm participates in venture capital, investing in and working with early-stage technology and life science companies with the main goal of taking the companies to public markets. The firm has also spun out and out-licensed technologies from universities and has capabilities to help with company formation, business strategy, IP, and early IPOs. The firm utilizes a sister company to further analyze company technologies and IPs. The firm can fund from $5-12M USD from Seed to Series A rounds with preference in US-based companies, though the firm is open to global companies. 
 
The firm is looking at biotech, medical devices, and diagnostics companies and is technology-agnostic. The firm generally does not look at digital health. There has been strong interest in immuno-oncology, neurology, and CNS. 
 

The firm works closely with companies and founders and will lead investment rounds. The firm typically requires taking a board or observer seat while deciding strategy, and once the company goes public, the firm will bring in a board member with expertise in the field. 

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com

Hot Investor Mandate: VC Firm Focuses on Global Early-Stage Medical Device Investments, With Strong Interest in Companies Developing Class III Devices

29 Jul

A venture capital firm, founded in 2019, is a global venture capital investor. The firm specializes in early-stage medical device companies and actively leverages expertise and industry resources to support portfolio companies. The firm prefers taking a leading role in investment rounds and may seek board seats in such cases. 

The firm focuses on medical devices and is open to all subsectors and indications. The firm seeks innovative technologies, primarily investing in Class III devices, and occasionally considers Class II devices if they demonstrate significant innovation. The firm is open to working with companies at all stages, including those in the early idea phase. 

The firm prefers founding teams with strong scientific expertise and comprehensive knowledge of their respective fields. 

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com