RESI JPM 2027 on Track to Surpass Last Year’s 850 Investors and Licensing Partners

By Claire Jeong, Chief Conference Officer, Vice President of Investor Research, Asia BD, LSN

More than 100 investors and licensing partners have already confirmed for RESI JPM 2027, and we are on pace to pass the 850 who attended last year

That number deserves a second look. Most conferences report total attendance, which is mostly other companies. 850 is the buy side alone: venture capital, corporate venture, family offices, angel groups, strategic investors, and pharma business development teams. People with mandates and checkbooks, in one room, during the one week of the year when the entire industry is already in San Francisco.

Meet the Confirmed Investors 

RESI JPM runs in person on January 11 and 12 at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis, with three additional days of virtual partnering on January 13, 18, and 19. It is LSN’s largest conference of the year.

Why Density Is the Product

The hard part of early-stage fundraising is not the pitch. It is access.

Institutional calendars during JPM Week are locked months in advance, and an early-stage company without an existing relationship generally cannot get on them. The companies that do well that week are the ones who were already in the conversation.

RESI was built to change the math. Instead of chasing a handful of meetings around the city, you walk into a room with hundreds of active investors and licensing partners and you select who you want to meet before you arrive.

What Is Coming to RESI JPM 2027

The confirmed group spans the full early-stage ecosystem: venture capital, corporate venture arms, family offices, angel groups, strategic investors, and pharma and medtech business development. Mandates cover therapeutics, diagnostics, medical technology, digital health, and platform technologies, across preclinical through Phase 2.

How to Get the Most Out of It

  • Partnering meetings. Our system lets you filter the investor audience by stage, indication, geography, and check size, then request meetings directly. You build your own schedule rather than hoping for a hallway encounter.
  • The Innovator’s Pitch Challenge. Present to a live investor panel, get scored feedback in front of the room, and put your company in front of people who are evaluating in real time. Applications close on Wednesday, November 11.
  • Three virtual partnering days. January 13, 18, and 19 extend your reach to investors who could not travel, including a large international contingent who partner with us remotely.

Register

Registration is open now, and the investor count is still climbing. The earlier you register, the earlier you can start requesting meetings against the confirmed list.

Register for RESI JPM 2027

Watch the Asset Flow, Not the Equity Flow: What I Learned at BioJapan

By Dennis Ford, Founder & CEO, Life Science Nation (LSN)

I recently returned from BioJapan, and the one takeaway I want to share with my global network is this: stop viewing Asia Pacific as a single market.

Regulations on both sides of the Pacific have made equity deals between the US and China much harder. But capital hasn’t stopped moving. It has changed form. Where equity deals run into friction, pharma licenses the asset instead. Chinese biotechs out-licensed $60 billion of assets in the first quarter of this year alone, up 73% from the same period a year earlier. That includes AstraZeneca’s deal with CSPC worth up to $18.5 billion. Large pharma faces a steep patent cliff before 2030, so its appetite for clinical-stage assets isn’t going away.

So watch the asset flow, not the equity flow. Here is what actually changed for me in Japan. I went in thinking about APAC as one market with local variations. It isn’t. It is three markets with three completely different jobs, and once you see them separately, the whole region stops looking confusing.

Three Markets, Not One

Each market plays a different role. China produces more assets than its domestic capital can absorb. Australia and Southeast Asia have the clinical infrastructure others can use. Japan and Korea stand out because they have both: a growing supply of academic innovation and deep corporate balance sheets looking for it.

Region Sell Side
(Early-Stage Assets)
Buy Side
(VC / PE / Pharma)
Characterization
Mainland China A large volume of high-quality assets, many moving faster than domestic capital can fund them Domestic equity is selective and US venture investment has pulled back, while global pharma licensing runs at record levels “The Asset Reservoir”
Japan, South Korea, & Taiwan A deep, largely untapped pool of academic assets, alongside mature platforms: ADCs and regenerative medicine in Japan, AI-driven discovery and diagnostics in Korea. Taiwan continues to produce world-class assets Active corporate venture arms and well-capitalized conglomerates “The Strategic Capital Track”
Australia & Southeast Asia Excellent trial infrastructure producing fast, high-quality human data Cross-border investors using local efficiency as a launchpad for global programs “The Clinical Fast Track”

Japan: Where Assets Meet Capital

Universities such as the University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Keio University, Osaka University, Kobe University, and the University of Tsukuba, with RIKEN anchoring the discovery end, are producing a remarkable range of new assets across drugs, devices, diagnostics, and digital health. What’s new is a coordinated government effort to carry those assets to market:

  • AMED runs a 2:1 double match-up program. When a registered VC invests in a Japanese drug discovery startup, AMED can add up to twice that amount in non-dilutive funding, awarded per pipeline rather than per company, so a startup with three approved programs can draw on it three times.
  • MEDISO, under the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, pairs ventures and university spinouts with experts in regulatory affairs, international development, and fundraising.
  • J-Bridge, run by JETRO, connects international innovators with Japanese corporates.

Three state-backed institutions, answering to different ministries, are working on the same bottleneck, and regional clusters are carrying that work into the field. For global investors and partners, that means Japanese assets now arrive better funded and better prepared, and Japanese corporate capital is easier to reach than it has been in years.

One Japanese advantage almost nobody prices correctly: Japan maintains a conditional, time-limited approval pathway for regenerative medicine products that can grant market access on evidence of probable benefit. No other major market offers that. If you have a cell or gene therapy and have never looked at Japan as a first market rather than a third one, you are leaving an option unexercised.

KBIC, the Kobe Biomedical Innovation Cluster, and LSN are working together to strengthen the commercialization pathway for Japanese life science companies through entrepreneur education, company preparation, capital formation, and international business development. At BioJapan in October, LSN presented joint sessions with KBIC, including one alongside MEDISO, on startup readiness and global fundraising.

RESI Asia: Tokyo and Kobe

That is why RESI is coming to Japan. RESI Asia Japan convenes in Tokyo on April 13, 2027, for global partnering. We expect to announce more events around RESI before and after the 13th

The Bottom Line

Regulatory boundaries have changed the rules, but pharma’s appetite for licensing shows the underlying science has never been more valuable. Watch the asset flow, not the equity flow. I look forward to seeing many of you in Tokyo next April.

RESI Asia Japan Registration:

Japan-base Registration (JPY)
Non-Japan-base Registration (USD)

Synaptic Bio, First-Place IPC Winner at RESI Boston: Building a Next-Generation Checkpoint Therapy

Synaptic Bio, the First-Place winner of the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI Boston, is advancing a tetravalent bispecific antibody designed to improve both the efficacy and tolerability of cancer immunotherapy. In this interview, the team shares how SYB302 applies immune synapse biology to PD-1 therapy, its path toward the clinic, and the investor and partnering conversations sparked at RESI. 

Yotam Levin
CEO and Co-Founder at Synaptic Bio
Caitlin Dolegowski
Program Director, LSN

Caitlin Dolegowski (CD): Introduce Synaptic Bio and the unmet need you are addressing in cancer immunotherapy. 

Yotam Levin (YL): Synaptic Bio is a spinout from Dr. Adam Mor’s lab at Columbia University, building bispecific antibodies around the biology of the immune synapse, the interface where a T cell and a tumor cell engage. Our lead program, SYB302, pairs a next-generation PD-1 blocker with IL-25 neutralization in a single asset. Checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) transformed oncology, but they leave a lot of patients behind. Roughly 800,000 people in the US are treated with ICIs each year, but an estimated 480,000 don’t respond. About half overall develop immune-related adverse events, an expected side effect of bolstering the immune system, and an estimated 140,000 patients have to stop therapy because of severe ones. So there are two problems: too few patients respond, and too many who do respond are forced off a drug that was working. We designed SYB302 to address both concerns.

CD: How does your tetravalent bispecific platform, including SYB302, leverage immune synapse biology to differentiate it from existing checkpoint therapies? 

YL: Today’s PD-1 antibodies mainly work by blocking PD-1 from binding its ligand. SYB302 adds a physical mechanism. Its PD-1 arms are long, and the molecule is larger than a standard antibody. That size pushes PD-1 out of the immune synapse so it can’t suppress the T cell. We have a cool movie on our website at www.synaptic-bio.com to show this. The tetravalent design adds a second mechanistic layer. IL-25 is a homodimer, so each IL-25 molecule can bridge two SYB302 antibodies. That clusters PD-1 on the T cell surface and drives its internalization and degradation. IL-25 is abundant in the tumor microenvironment, so the effect is strongest where we want it. IL-25 is also a driver of immune-related toxicity. Neutralizing this cytokine gives us a built-in safety brake. In preclinical models, including colon, melanoma, and bladder tumors, SYB302 showed stronger tumor control than anti-PD-1 with markedly less organ damage. A single antibody designed to improve both efficacy and tolerability – we have not seen any other antibody that does both.

CD: What are the most important scientific or development milestones over the next 12 to 18 months? 

YL: Our focus is moving SYB302 from a mature Development Candidate toward the clinic. The key milestones are:

  1. Stable cell line and process: completing cell line development and defining the manufacturing process, targeted around month 9 after funding.
  1. FDA engagement: a pre-IND meeting, targeted around month 12.
  1. GMP and toxicology: starting GMP manufacturing and GLP toxicology, leading to an IND submission at about month 24.

In parallel, we’ll expand our preclinical data in colorectal cancer and other indication-specific models, characterize IL-25 as a potential patient-selection biomarker, and advance the manuscript describing the SYB302 data. Colorectal cancer, particularly the MSS subtype that responds poorly to current checkpoint inhibitors, is our lead indication. CRC is a very prevalent disease with few treatment options. As supported by the biology of IL-25, this tumor shows that having high levels of IL-25 correlates highly with poor overall survival.

CD: What did being named First Place winner of the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge at RESI Boston mean to your team? 

YL: It was a meaningful validation, especially coming from an audience of investors and industry experts who evaluate hundreds of stories a year. Our science comes from a university lab and takes a different approach to PD-1 biology, so it’s rewarding to see that message resonate with people who understand the field. It also reinforces our conviction that the next generation of checkpoint therapy needs to deliver both better efficacy and better tolerability.

Preparing for the pitch was fun, because we had to distill a 30 to 60-minute story into a mere six minutes. This forced substantial simplification on one hand, but it also required us to ensure a sophisticated audience gets what they came for – understanding the essence of what we do. The most critical listener in the audience was, of course, Professor Mor – the fact that he liked the presentation was yet another award.

CD: What aspects of the RESI experience, including the pitch, judge feedback, or partnering conversations, were most valuable? 

YL:

  1. The pitch: We had to make multiple decisions on what to leave behind and not share. It’s like asking – of the 12 major value propositions of your assets, what are the one and a half that you really need to focus on?
  2. Judge feedback: The judges were very insightful, despite the brevity of the presentation and lack of detail. One asked about breakdown of budgets and its assumptions, identifying some assumptions we’ve taken without showing them. I was happy we could answer the questions quickly without to use backup slides for an answer.
  3. RESI Sessions: We really enjoyed the panels because they brought industry leaders and experienced investors. We could get a much better feel for what individual fund managers expect to see, how they differ from one another, how to overcome the overwhelming noise of hundreds of pitches and business plans, and whether or not there is a likely fit with certain parties. Meeting these investors in person instead of through email, Zoom, or networking apps made all the difference.

CD: Did RESI Boston lead to any meaningful investor, strategic partner, or scientific conversations that you expect to continue? 

YL: Yes. We had productive conversations with a few investors and potential strategic partners, and several are in the funnel. I can’t share specifics of course, but the interest has been in both SYB302 and the broader platform.

CD: What types of investors or strategic partners would be most valuable, and why should other early-stage companies consider the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge? 

YL: We’re looking for partners who understand the immuno-oncology landscape and can support a long development path. That includes biotech-focused venture investors for our seed financing, and strategic partners in oncology and immunology who see the value of a differentiated PD-1 backbone. For our lead asset, we prefer traditional seed funding; for our additional assets in Type2 inflammation we also foresee single-asset licensing, option-based co-development or a strategic investment. We think corporate VCs could be a natural fit, because they have deep scientific expertise but also an eye for market access. Our strongest asset is our science, data, and results – having experienced investors in our team would go a long way.

Apply to Pitch at RESI JPM 2027

The Missing Piece in Preparing Life Science Companies for Investors

By Dennis Ford, Founder & CEO, Life Science Nation (LSN)

One of the most pervasive problems we see across life science entrepreneurial programs is that Entrepreneurs-in-Residence (EIRs) help companies develop executive summaries and pitch decks that emphasize the science and market opportunity. This approach repeats across incubators, accelerators, universities, and entrepreneurial training programs worldwide.

The problem is that the two sides of the table are speaking different languages. The sell side presents science and market potential, while investors and licensing partners evaluate the seven-layer risk stack: market, technical, regulatory, execution, economic, financing, and exit risk. They want to understand which risks have been retired, which remain, and what evidence supports the company’s ability to overcome them.

This is precisely where LSN spends its time preparing companies for global roadshows and RESI partnering events.

We begin with the LSN assessment, which identifies where the company sits within the risk stack, what has been accomplished, and what remains to be de-risked. We then reconstitute the executive summary and pitch deck to speak the language of risk, supported by evidence rather than simply promoting the science and market opportunity.

We also develop a milestone-driven Gantt chart that shows the development milestones already completed and the value created, the one, two, or three critical milestones ahead for the remainder of the current year, and the subsequent development and de-risking milestones planned for years two and three.

The capital ask becomes the financial expression of the de-risking plan. By calculating the cost of the current and future milestones, the company can explain precisely how much capital it needs, what that capital will accomplish, which risks will be retired, and how achieving those milestones is expected to increase the asset’s value.

This is the fundamental distinction between a conventional pitch deck and a de-risked deck. One emphasizes the promise of the science and the size of the market. The other demonstrates a credible, milestone-driven, financed pathway to making that science investable.

That is the missing commercialization discipline LSN brings to the table, and it is what investors and licensing partners are looking for.

Register for RESI JPM 2027

RESI JPM 2027 Investor Panel Lineup Announced 

By Claire Jeong, Chief Conference Officer, Vice President of Investor Research, Asia BD, LSN

Life Science Nation is pleased to announce the finalized investor panel lineup for RESI JPM 2027, taking place January 11 and 12 at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis during J.P. Morgan Healthcare Week.

The two day program features 14 investor sessions across therapeutics, medtech, diagnostics, digital health, platform technologies, strategic partnerships, and alternative sources of capital.

Monday, January 11

9:00 AM | Follow the Money [2027 Outlook & Trends]

Where Life Science & Healthcare Investors See Opportunity in 2027

Every year at JPM, one question sets the tone for the week: where is the capital going? Investors from across therapeutics, medtech, diagnostics, digital health, and tools take the stage to share what they are seeing in fundraising, valuations, and exit windows. They will discuss which sectors are attracting conviction, which are being left behind, and how their own priorities have shifted since last year. Whether you are raising, investing, or building, this is the read on the market you need before the deals begin.

10:00 AM | What Is Fundable Now: Therapeutics [Early Stage Therapeutics]

What Earns a Term Sheet from Early Stage Biotech Investors

Early stage therapeutics investors must weigh scientific promise against the risks of translating it into a viable treatment. Seed through Series A investors get candid about what earns their conviction: differentiated biology, convincing translational evidence, and a credible clinical development strategy. The discussion explores how investors assess target validation, competitive positioning, safety, and the experiments needed to reduce key development risks. Expect frank talk about what makes them lean in, what makes them pass, and how founders can make a compelling scientific and investment case for a therapeutic program.

11:00 AM | Backing the Next Medical Breakthrough [Medical Devices]

How Investors Evaluate Early Stage Device Innovation

Medical device companies face distinct investment hurdles, from proving technical feasibility to establishing a path to clinical adoption. This panel brings together medtech investors to discuss how they evaluate early stage opportunities across surgical technologies, robotics, monitoring, wearables, and home care. The conversation examines clinical need, regulatory strategy, reimbursement, usability, and the evidence required to support adoption. Hear what makes a device differentiated, how investors assess development and commercial risk, and which milestones strengthen the case for investment.

1:00 PM | Strategics at the Table [Strategics]

How Corporate Partners Decide When to Invest, Partner & Acquire

Strategic partners are shaping which technologies reach patients, and they are increasingly involved long before a company is ready to sell. Business development leaders from pharma and medtech join corporate venture investors to explain when they engage, what they need to see, and how they think about partnering, investing, and acquiring. Learn how to get on a strategic partner’s radar, what makes a startup stand out in a crowded pipeline, and how to build a relationship that lasts beyond a single deal.

2:00 PM | The First Believers [First Check Investors]

How the Earliest Backers Turn Life Science Ideas into Fundable Companies

Every great company has someone who said yes first. This panel gathers the earliest backers in life sciences: angels, seed funds, venture studios, foundations, and accelerators. They explain how they evaluate opportunities before substantial scientific or commercial validation, what they look for in a founding team, and what gives them the conviction to write the first check. The conversation covers company formation, initial experiments, and how early capital and hands on support help founders establish a credible development path. For founders at the very start, it is a candid map of the road from initial concept to the first funded development milestones.

3:00 PM | The Brain Trust [CNS / Neuro]

Investing Across Neuroscience & Psychiatry

Few areas of medicine combine such enormous unmet need with such complex investment challenges. This panel brings together investors in therapeutics, neuromodulation devices, digital biomarkers, and diagnostics to discuss what draws capital into neuroscience and psychiatry. Together they explore how advances in biology, technology, and clinical trial design can reopen areas once considered too difficult, and how founders across modalities can position themselves to attract investment.

4:00 PM | Patient Capital [Family Offices]

How Family Offices Are Investing Directly in Life Sciences

Family offices offer a distinct route to life science capital through direct investing, syndication with peers, and investment structures that can support longer time horizons. This session explores what draws private capital to highly technical opportunities, how family offices diligence science and technology, and what founders should know before approaching them. Panelists discuss how they structure investments, work with specialist co-investors, and assess follow-on needs. It is a practical look at how to earn the confidence of this diverse investor community.

Tuesday, January 12

9:00 AM | Investing in Longer, Healthier Lives [Longevity]

The Science and Technologies Addressing Age Related Disease

Helping people live longer, healthier lives requires addressing the diseases and functional challenges that come with aging. This panel brings together therapeutics, medtech, diagnostics, and digital health investors to explore opportunities in cardiometabolic disease, musculoskeletal health, physical function, and maintaining independence. The discussion examines how investors evaluate treatments for specific age related conditions alongside technologies that address underlying aging biology, detect risk earlier, or help people remain active. Hear what constitutes meaningful clinical evidence, how companies define a viable path to market, and what makes an opportunity compelling for early stage investment.

10:00 AM | Digital Health After the Hype [Digital Health]

What Investors Want to See in Evidence, Adoption & Economics

The digital health market has been through a reset. Investors discuss what they are backing now: clinical grade AI, new models of care delivery, and businesses with evidence, engagement, and economics that hold up to scrutiny. Hear where value is being created, what has changed in how these companies are evaluated, and what separates durable businesses from those that struggle to convert adoption into sustainable growth.

11:00 AM | Enabling the Next Generation of Medicine [Platform Technologies]

Investing in Discovery Platforms, Delivery Technologies & Research Tools

Some of the most valuable companies in life sciences make new medicines possible. This panel brings together investors backing AI enabled discovery platforms, delivery technologies, synthetic biology, and the research tools that accelerate development. The conversation centers on how to separate a durable platform from a clever technology, how investors evaluate platform companies alongside tools and infrastructure businesses, and how business models differ from those of asset driven companies. Hear what makes these technologies investable and where founders can build lasting value.

1:00 PM | Capital Across Borders [Cross Border Investors]

How International Investors Evaluate and Finance Life Science Companies

Cross border investment can expand a company’s funding options, but attracting international capital requires understanding how investors evaluate opportunities beyond their home markets. This panel brings together investors from different regions to discuss geographic mandates, due diligence, syndication, and the local presence or development plans they expect from companies abroad. Hear what makes a company attractive to overseas investors, how investors work with local co-investors, and how founders can build relationships that lead to cross border financing.

2:00 PM | Runway Without the Round [Beyond Venture Capital]

Financing the Next Milestone Beyond Conventional Venture Equity

A conventional venture round is not the only way to fund a company. This panel explores non dilutive grants, foundation funding, venture debt, royalty financing, strategic agreements, and government backed programs. Capital providers explain who qualifies, what stage or evidence their funding requires, how long the process takes, and what obligations or tradeoffs founders should understand. The discussion examines which sources are suitable for early stage companies and how they can complement equity financing. Hear how to match funding to a development milestone and extend runway without relying solely on another conventional venture round.

3:00 PM | From Seed to Series A

Building the Evidence and Investor Confidence for the Next Round

Securing seed funding is only the beginning. This panel brings together seed investors and Series A investors to explore how life science companies turn initial funding into a financeable next round. The discussion covers setting achievable milestones, demonstrating progress against the original investment thesis, identifying a lead investor, and building a syndicate. Across therapeutics, medtech, and digital health, panelists discuss how founders should align development plans, capital needs, and fundraising timelines. Hear how existing investors assess follow-on support, what new investors need to see, and how to address gaps that can leave promising companies between rounds.

4:00 PM | The Investor Reverse Pitch

Meet the Investors and Discover What They Want to Fund

To close the conference, the roles flip. Investors from across therapeutics, medtech, diagnostics, digital health, and tools take the stage to pitch their mandates: what they invest in, at which stage, with what check size, and what gets their attention. Investors deliver short presentations, followed by audience Q&A. Founders leave with a clear list of who to follow up with and how to approach them. It is a practical, high energy finish to two days of conversations.

Speaker Submissions

Life Science Nation is currently seeking qualified investors, corporate business development leaders, family office representatives, and other capital providers for speaker consideration. Submit a speaker application.

Submit a speaker application

Fundraising Requires More Than a Plan. It Requires Execution. (Part 2) 

By Max Braht, VP of Business Development, LSN

Max-Braht-Headshot

Experienced life science executives who have successfully raised capital understand something that first-time fundraisers often underestimate: a successful fundraising campaign is not built around a handful of investor introductions or a series of meetings at industry conferences. It is built around a large, qualified, continuously evolving list of investor and licensing-partner targets, supported by the disciplined execution required to keep that list working throughout the campaign.

Last week, I discussed why fundraising requires both a focused strategy and consistent execution. But there is another critical component that deserves more attention: the target list itself. It is the foundation of the entire campaign, and building, maintaining, and continually replenishing that list is one of the most demanding aspects of raising capital.

At Life Science Nation, we have found that experienced fundraising executives are often the first to recognize the value of our BD Assist program. They have been through the process before. They understand that a serious life science fundraising campaign can take 9–18 months, and that a campaign of that duration needs to begin with approximately 800–1,000 qualified investor and licensing-partner targets.

Just as importantly, they know that the original list will not remain intact. Investors respond, decline, change their investment mandates, move into diligence, or prove to be inappropriate targets. Some relationships advance while others are eliminated from consideration. Throughout this process, new qualified targets must continually enter the pipeline to replace those that have fallen away. The campaign is constantly moving, with prospects entering, advancing, and exiting at different stages.

The target list is not a static spreadsheet. It is the engine that drives the fundraising campaign.

Keeping that engine running requires much more than sending emails. It means identifying investors whose investment theses align with the company’s technology, development stage, financing requirements, and geography. It means researching investment activity, finding the appropriate contacts, developing compelling messaging, canvassing prospects, tracking responses, managing follow-up, and maintaining a steady flow of new opportunities.

Experienced executives know how difficult this is because they have done it themselves. They understand that maintaining a professional fundraising campaign often requires a dedicated full-time resource whose responsibility is to keep the target list accurate, active, and continuously replenished. They also know how tedious and time-consuming that work can become, particularly while managing the scientific, clinical, regulatory, financial, and operational responsibilities of an emerging life science company.

This is the fundamental value proposition of LSN’s BD Assist program. LSN has spent years building and maintaining a global database of investors and licensing partners, developing the market intelligence and processes required to identify appropriate targets and execute sustained fundraising campaigns. BD Assist combines that infrastructure with the daily canvassing, outreach, scheduling, tracking, and follow-up needed to keep a campaign moving forward. Rather than building this capability internally, executives can leverage LSN’s existing database, investor intelligence, and business development team to maintain the campaign engine while they concentrate on running their companies and advancing relationships with interested investors.

The value is not simply that BD Assist takes work off an executive’s desk. It provides access to an established fundraising infrastructure that would otherwise take considerable time, money, and effort to replicate.

Timing: Preparing for RESI JPM

The life sciences industry is now preparing for JPM Healthcare Week, when biotech, medtech, diagnostics, digital health, and investment professionals from around the world will gather to establish new relationships and advance existing ones. RESI JPM provides an important opportunity for early-stage companies to meet investors and licensing partners whose interests align with their development and financing objectives. But experienced fundraisers know that conferences are not standalone fundraising strategies. They are opportunities within a much larger campaign.

The companies that benefit most from RESI are those that arrive with a well-developed target list, know which investors they need to meet, have already begun their outreach, and are prepared to continue those conversations long after the conference concludes.

A meeting at RESI may initiate a relationship, advance an existing discussion, or reveal that an investor is not an appropriate fit. Each outcome provides information that helps refine the target list and determine the next step. Meanwhile, the broader fundraising campaign must continue generating new prospects, new conversations, and new opportunities.

RESI creates access. The continuously replenished target list and the execution behind it turn that access into a sustained fundraising campaign.

For executives who have raised capital before, none of this is new. They know what it takes to build a successful campaign, and they know how difficult it is to keep the engine running for 9–18 months. What LSN offers through BD Assist is the infrastructure, investor intelligence, and dedicated execution capability to help them do exactly that.

Ready to Put Your Fundraising Campaign into Motion?

If you are preparing for RESI JPM or planning a sustained fundraising campaign, LSN’s BD Assist team can help you build, maintain, and continuously canvass the global investor and licensing-partner target list that drives the process.

Because a successful fundraising campaign does not run on meetings alone. It runs on a continuously replenished pipeline of qualified targets.

Get Your LSN Labs Company Assessment Report

RESI Asia Japan Opens New Gateway to Global Life Science Partnerships 

By Momo Yamamoto, Senior Investor Research Analyst, LSN

Life Science Nation is pleased to announce the launch of RESI Asia Japan, a new conference created in collaboration with the Kobe Biomedical Innovation Cluster (KBIC), Japan’s largest biomedical cluster.

Taking place on April 13, 2027, at the ANA InterContinental Tokyo, RESI Asia Japan will bring together early-stage life science companies, investors, strategic partners, and regional stakeholders for a day of in-person programming, followed by virtual partnering opportunities.

The event expands Life Science Nation’s global platform for connecting innovative companies with the capital and strategic relationships needed to advance their technologies. For companies seeking to enter Japan, build international partnerships, or connect with new sources of capital, RESI Asia Japan provides a direct pathway into one of the world’s most important life science markets.

Why Japan Matters for Life Science Companies

Japan is home to major global pharmaceutical companies, including Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Chugai, and Ono. These organizations are active participants in licensing, acquisition, and external innovation partnerships, creating meaningful opportunities for early-stage companies with differentiated technologies and strong development plans.

A Japan rights deal can provide early non-dilutive capital, strategic validation, and a foundation for broader international growth. Japan also offers deep clinical trial and CRO capacity, as well as a regulatory environment with meaningful opportunities for regenerative medicine and cell and gene therapy development.

Yet the market can be difficult to access from outside the region. Identifying the right partners, arranging initial meetings, understanding the regulatory landscape, and navigating local business relationships all require a focused approach. RESI Asia Japan is designed to help bridge that gap.

A Partnership Built for Global Connection

RESI Asia Japan is the culmination of a three-conference collaboration between Life Science Nation and KBIC. KBIC served as a Title Sponsor at RESI Boston in September 2026 and will continue its partnership at RESI JPM in January 2027, leading into the inaugural Tokyo event in April.

For companies participating across the series, the partnership creates three opportunities to engage with the LSN network over seven months, while building visibility with investors, strategic partners, and life science stakeholders across the United States and Japan.

Beyond the conference itself, Life Science Nation and KBIC are working to strengthen the commercialization pathway for Japanese life science companies through entrepreneur education, company preparation, capital formation, and international business development.

Registration Is Open

RESI Asia Japan offers a 5-Day Hybrid format, including the in-person conference in Tokyo and virtual programming, as well as a 4-Day Virtual Partnering format.

Japan-base Registration (JPY)
Non-Japan-base Registration (USD)

Explore the RESI 2027 Series

RESI Asia Japan is part of Life Science Nation’s 2027 global conference series, creating multiple opportunities throughout the year to connect with investors, strategic partners, and life science innovators.

  • RESI JPM: January 11 to 12 in San Francisco, with virtual partnering on January 13, 18, and 19
  • RESI Asia Japan: April in Tokyo
  • RESI Philadelphia: June
  • RESI Boston: September

Learn more about the full RESI 2027 series at RESIConference.com.