Refine your fundraising strategy and investor engagement with hands-on insights from industry experts.
Life Science Nation (LSN) invites early-stage life science and healthcare executives to an exclusive Fundraising Bootcamp during London Bio-Innovation Week 2026. This free, half-day workshop is designed to help entrepreneurs strengthen their fundraising strategy, improve investor engagement, and sharpen their pitching skills through interactive, expert-led sessions.
Date and Time: Tuesday, December 2, 1:00 PM – 5:00 PM Location: Fieldfisher Law Firm, Riverbank House, 2 Swan Lane, London Cost: Free
The LSN Fundraising Bootcamp brings together investors, fundraising professionals, and industry experts to provide a clear view of the current investor landscape and actionable strategies for early-stage companies preparing for their next raise.
Session topics include It All Starts with The Story, Global Partnering Campaign – Investor Landscape, GTL & GPC, LSN Event Partnering Process, and Maximizing The Power Of Your Pitch. The program concludes with a live Sharktank-style session where participants pitch their companies to a panel of experts and receive real-time feedback.
This interactive event offers practical guidance and the chance to connect with key players in the global life science ecosystem.
This year’s Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Mary Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell and Shimon Sakaguchi for the discovery of regulatory T cells (Tregs)— white blood cells whose role it is to suppress overactivation of our immune system. The prize was unusual in that Brunkow made her discoveries while leading an industry R&D team at Darwin Molecular (now defunct). Ramsdell and Sakaguchi are also co-founders of two prominent biotech companies developing Treg therapies: Ramsdell’s Sonoma Biotherapeutics is developing autologous Treg therapies against arthritis and hidradenitis suppurativa, together with a LFA3-IgG1 fusion molecule for depleting CD2+ effector T cells; and Sakaguchi’s Coya Therapeutics is developing a low-dose interleukin 2 (IL-2)/CTLA-IgG1 fusion combination for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurodegenerative disorders; the Nobel prize likely helped boost Coya’s announcement in October to raise $20 million in follow-on funding on the public markets.
Tregs suppress the ability of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to present antigen to and co-stimulate effector T cells (Teff). In the lymph nodes, the TCR of a Treg cell binds the antigen–major histocompatibility complex (MHC) displayed on the APC, while Treg CTLA4 binds CD80 and CD86 on the APC, blocking Teff access to the same antigen. Tregs also release regulatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), to suppress inflammation. In addition, Tregs express the high-affinity IL-2 receptor CD25, which outcompetes the IL-2 receptor of Teffs. Tregs also express the CD39 and CD73, ectonucleases that convert ATP to adenosine, another anti-inflammatory molecule. Last, Tregs establish a long-lasting tolerogenic environment by turning Teffs into Tregs. Source: Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
Tregs have long attracted the attention of drug developers interested in autoimmune conditions, diseases where the immune system is overactive. But progress in this field has been slow, and the first clinical results for T-reg cell therapies are only now beginning to emerge in liver transplantation and kidney transplantation. (Low-dose IL-2 treatments that promote Tregs have also begun to show promise in lupus and systemic sclerosis patients.)
The overarching idea behind Treg cell therapy has been to isolate these cells from a patient, introduce/upregulate expression of the FOXP3 transcription factor that marks them from other T cells, and expand them before giving them back to the patient.
Tregs are commonly isolated based on their expression of CD4+ CD25high CD127− and CD45RA+. CD4+ T cells can also be engineered to express FOXP3, the master regulator of Treg development. Tregs can be expanded ex vivo using a polyclonal T cell stimulus like low-dose IL2, small molecules like rapamycin, or (preferably) exposing them to APCs carrying disease-relevant antigens, aiming to enrich the Treg population for a specific antigen. Tregs can also be engineered by expressing a TCR or CAR. The resulting cells are then administered to patients, often together with other immunosuppressive agents. Gene editing has also been proposed as a mechanism to enhance the function and stability of Tregs. Source: Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
Early attempts to develop this autologous therapy failed in part because Tregs are less numerous in the peripheral blood than effector CD4/CD8 T cells, difficult to isolate and problematic to expand. Moreover, the isolated Tregs are polyclonal, targeting multiple antigens. Approaches that expanded this unmodified polyclonal population of cells and put them back into patients resulted in a ‘diluted’, clinically insignificant, therapeutic effect.
To address this problem, companies are now turning to leverage advances in the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy field. A whole slew of Treg cell therapies is being engineered with CARs or T-cell receptors (TCRs), allowing targeting to specific antigens in specific organs.
As we mentioned above, the most advanced of these are in the organ-transplantation field, where chronic immunosuppression renders patients susceptible to infections that can be lethal. Sangamo Therapeutics’ TX200 and Quell Therapeutics’ QEL-001 are CAR-Treg therapies for renal- and liver-transplant rejection, respectively. These assets, which are in phase 1/2, both bind to human leukocyte antigen HLA-A2, which is exclusively expressed on the transplanted donor organ, ensuring that the Tregs travel exclusively to the place where they are needed. Elsewhere, Sonoma is also developing an autologous CAR-Treg therapy, SBT-77-7101, that targets citrullinated proteins abundant in rheumatoid arthritis (for which Sonoma recently announced positive interim phase 1 data) and the skin condition hidradenitis suppurativa.
A second focus for companies has been on TCR-engineered Tregs. The great theoretical advantages of TCRs over CARs are that 1) they have high sensitivity at low antigen density, 2) they focus exclusively on antigen-presenting cells which then reeducate/suppress effector T cells; 3) they don’t bind soluble antigen and 4) most autoimmune diseases are driven by intracellular proteins presented as processed peptides in the context of HLA. As yet, however, only a few companies are pursuing the approach. One example is GentiBio, which is developing GNTI-122 for type 1 diabetes. This Treg product expresses a TCR targeting a fragment (IGRP 305–324) of the pancreatic islet-specific antigen glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP). Another pioneer in this area, Abata Therapeutics, had also been developing a TCR-engineered Treg therapy (targeting myelin peptide/HLA-DRB1*15:01 for multiple sclerosis); however, the frosty financing environment in the first half of 2025 meant it ran out of cash and Abata closed its doors in August.
One challenge that all Treg cell therapies face is the plasticity of these cells and their tendency to shape shift into effector T cells, a phenotypic change that, in the therapeutic setting, could lower efficacy or even exacerbate pathology. One approach to address this problem has been to modify the cells by overexpressing the transcription factor FOXP3, the master regulator of Treg development. For example, as methylation of the FOXP3 promoter under inflammatory conditions can turn Tregs Into effector T cells, Quell’s Tregs are engineered with a methylation-resistant FOXP3 that compels the cells to remain in their suppressor phenotype. And to bring us back to where we started, Nobel laureate Sakaguchi turns out to be a serial entrepreneur, founding another company, Regcell, that recently relocated from Japan to the US on the back of a $45.8 million financing back in March. The company is using small-molecule CDK8/19 inhibitors that act as epigenetic modulators to lock in FOXP3+ Tregs that show a stable suppressive phenotype in vivo.
But Treg cell therapies still face stiff competition. Ironically, perhaps, from their antithesis: the effector CAR-T cell. Pioneering work by Georg Schett’s group at Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg has galvanized numerous efforts to develop CAR-T depleters of pathogenic B-cell or plasma-cell subsets in autoimmune conditions. Evidence is growing for the clinical efficacy of this approach in diseases such as lupus or myasthenia gravis.
But the holy grail would be to dispense with cell therapy altogether and promote Treg activity in situ, without the need for purification and modification/expansion outside the body. By focusing on injectable biologics, many companies can bring products to market that are easily accommodated into current clinical practice, dispensing with the need for leukopheresis (an approach alien to most rheumatologists) and the complex logistics of ex vivo cell therapy.
The Treg field can rightly celebrate its Nobel recognition and the progress made towards bringing this cell type to patients. Although it will likely be several years before we gain a full picture of how Treg biology can be leveraged to fight autoimmune disease, the field eagerly awaits the readout from early efficacy trials of cell therapies and potentially an FDA-approved product for the biologics in later development.
This venture capital firm with offices in the US is exclusively focused on the AI transformation of healthcare, operating through a physician-centric model that leverages a broad network of medical professionals actively involved in both the investment process and the development of AI solutions, particularly in medical imaging.
The firm invests at the pre-Seed, Seed, and Series A stages, with typical check sizes ranging from $1 million to $2 million. While most investments have been made in U.S.-based companies, the firm remains open to international opportunities, including those in Europe and Asia.
Investment focus is tightly concentrated on disruptive AI-driven technologies in the medical imaging market. The firm does not invest in traditional therapeutics or medical devices, and is currently not considering opportunities outside of AI-centric digital health technologies related to imaging. It is open to investing in companies as early as the pre-prototype stage, provided they are aligned with the firm’s strategic thesis.
The firm seeks to partner with highly driven management teams who possess deep domain expertise across imaging, artificial intelligence, and medical software. While the firm typically co-invests, it maintains an active, hands-on approach, especially through the support of its physician investor network, which helps accelerate product development and clinical relevance.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
A Europe-based venture capital firm invests across two primary verticals: healthcare innovation and sustainability. The firm typically invests at the seed stage, with initial check sizes ranging from €1 million to €5 million. Its geographic deployment is relatively balanced, with approximately half of investments made in Europe and the other half in the United States. The firm shows particular interest in U.S.-based companies founded by European entrepreneurs.
The firm invests across therapeutics, diagnostics, medical devices, and digital health, taking an agnostic approach within these sectors. It does not enforce strict criteria regarding the composition or background of founding teams.
Open to both leading and co-investing, the firm places strong emphasis on the mission and purpose behind each company, placing value on teams with a compelling “why” that drives their approach to solving pressing problems in healthcare.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
This corporate strategic evergreen fund based in the US has invested in over 50 life sciences companies and considers both public and private opportunities in the United States and internationally. The firm is a flexible investor, with initial allocations typically ranging from $1 million to $10 million, depending on the developmental stage of the company.
The firm invests in therapeutics and medical devices, with the latter limited to implantable products requiring PMA submission. It invests exclusively in companies with clinical-stage assets, and is indication-agnostic, open to innovation across all areas of medicine.
This investor adopts a flexible approach to management teams, and is willing to take a more hands-on role in cases where founding teams have limited internal resources. A high level of transparency is required from portfolio companies, and the firm actively supports strategic planning around value-driving clinical studies that can meaningfully advance the company’s trajectory.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
This life sciences-focused investment firm backed by a prominent family office is actively investing in life science and healthcare companies across the globe, with a focus on those that are based near their headquarters.
The firm invests in early-stage healthcare companies, with interest in therapeutics, diagnostics, and digital health. It is agnostic to technology type and therapeutic indication, but prefers opportunities with robust pre-clinical data. The firm is open to both pre-clinical and clinical-stage projects, though it does not invest in medical device companies at this time.
The firm is focused on supporting innovative technologies and is open to partnering with both first-time and experienced founding teams. It is flexible in its role, willing to act as either a lead investor or a co-investor, depending on the structure and needs of the financing round.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
Many entrepreneurs hope there’s a “secret sauce” or formula for success. In reality, it’s much more about attitude and persistence than any secret trick. Across hundreds of startups we’ve met, the most consistent trait among successful founders is determination — the willingness to try every avenue, face setbacks head-on, and keep finding new ways forward.
One of the toughest challenges founders face is getting in front of investors. Whether it’s outreach for a partnering event, sending a cold email, or following up after a meeting, responses can be few and far between. This silence often feels discouraging — some see it as rejection or assume something’s wrong with their company. More often than not, though, it’s simply a matter of timing, clarity, or persistence.
At RESI, we’ve seen time and again that the entrepreneurs who keep going — who adapt and stay visible — are the ones who eventually break through. Here are a few strategies that can make the difference:
Keep Following Up
Persistence pays off. One CEO sent 20 follow-up emails over six months before finally securing a meeting. The investor only vaguely remembered the company but appreciated the founder’s consistency and determination. The lesson? As long as you haven’t heard “no,” keep reaching out. You’re not being a nuisance — you’re demonstrating commitment.
Find Another Approach
When one CEO didn’t get as many meetings as hoped at a RESI event, he asked which investors from his target list had checked in. Armed with that information, he sought them out while networking, leading to several meaningful conversations. Whether it’s catching investors after a panel, reaching out via LinkedIn, or changing your communication style, adapt until you make contact.
Visibility matters. One Innovator’s Pitch Challenge (IPC) participant hosted a raffle at their poster to attract attendees. The result? Buzz around their company, new ad hoc meetings, and ultimately, an IPC win. By creating a memorable experience, they stood out in a crowded environment — and investors took notice.
There’s no shortcut to building investor relationships — but determination, creativity, and consistent action go a long way. Keep putting yourself and your company out there, follow up with intention, and make every opportunity count. At RESI, we see it time and again: the founders who stay proactive and visible are the ones who get results.
The firm is focused on therapeutics companies and does not invest in medical devices, diagnostics, or digital health. The firm is open to considering assets of very early stages, even those as early as lead optimization phase. The firm considers various modalities, including antibodies, small molecules, and cell therapy. Currently, the firm is not interested in gene therapy. Indication-wise, the firm is most interested in oncology and autoimmune diseases but has recently looked at fibrotic diseases and certain rare diseases as well.
The firm is opportunistic across all subsectors of healthcare. Within MedTech, the firm is most interested in medical devices, artificial intelligence, robotics, and mobile health. The firm is seeking post-prototype innovations that are FDA cleared or are close to receiving clearance. Within therapeutics, the firm is interested in therapeutics for large disease markets such as oncology, neurology, and metabolic diseases. The firm is open to all modalities with a special interest in immunotherapy and cell therapy.
A strategic investment firm of a large global pharmaceutical makes investments ranging from $5 million to $30 million, acting either as a sole investor or within a syndicate. The firm is open to considering therapeutic opportunities globally, but only if the company is pursuing a market opportunity in the USA and is in dialogue with the US FDA.
The firm is currently looking for new investment opportunities in enterprise software, medical devices, and the healthcare IT space. The firm will invest in 510k devices and healthcare IT companies, and it is very opportunistic in terms of indications. In the past, the firm was active in medical device companies developing dental devices, endovascular innovation devices, and women’s health devices.
A venture capital firm founded in 2005 has multiple offices throughout Asia, New York, and San Diego. The firm has closed its fifth fund in 2017 and is currently raising a sixth fund, which the firm is targeting to be the largest fund to date. The firm continues to actively seek investment opportunities across a […]