Tag Archives: Medtech

Hot Investor Mandate 4: Large Quebec-Based Firm Seeks Early-Stage Single Asset/Platform Technologies in Therapeutics and Revenue-Generating Medtech Companies

22 Mar

A development capital fund of 30+ years of investment experience actively seeks opportunities in the life sciences. The firm’s mission is to provide returns to its 600,000+ shareholders, and contribute to Québec’s economic growth through investments in small and medium-sized businesses from all industrial sectors. Its evergreen fund structure ables the firm to take a long-term approach on investments. Allocations in co-syndicated deals start at $1M but mostly range from $3-10M. The firm could co-lead investments. The firm seeks to invest in businesses with a significant presence in Québec, defined as having over half of its employees based in the province, or significant activities in the province.

The firm has been a consistent life sciences investor for the past 30+ years. The firm is interested in both single asset and platform technology companies across a wide range of therapeutics including small molecules, biologics, cell therapy, gene therapy, etc. The firm is agnostic to therapeutic areas and invests at multiple development stages from pre-IND activities to Phase III. In medical devices and diagnostics, the firm invests only in profitable companies or those with an approved product.

The firm is looking for experienced management teams with expertise in the indication area. It will consider first-time-CEOs who have been able to attract seasoned professionals on the board and SAB.

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email mandates@lifesciencenation.com.

Family Offices Converge on RESI to Meet Early Stage Biotech and Medtech Startups

8 Jun

By Lucy Parkinson, Director of Research, LSN

RESI is a venue where early stage life science startups can meet with investors of every type that are a fit for their company’s technology and stage – and that includes family offices. RESI San Diego features two panels devoted to this elusive investor class – Biotech Family Offices and Medtech Family Offices. Whether you’re developing a novel therapeutic, an innovative device or an improved diagnostic solution, Family Offices can’t be overlooked as a potential source of capital and RESI will provide you with the opportunity to hear advice and insight directly from key investment decision makers from family offices.

Biotech Family Offices, moderated by Colin Widen (CEO, Boston Innovation Capital), features:

Medtech Family Offices, moderated by Michael Quigley (VP of Market Research, Life Science Nation), features:

To catch this rare opportunity to meet family office investors with a focus on early stage life science investment, register for RESI now.

RESI Boston Panel Announcement: Medtech Strategic Firms Partnering for Innovation

4 Aug

By Lucy Parkinson, Director of Research, LSN

It’s well known that big pharma firms are often looking to partner early.  Many major medical device companies are also looking outward for innovation, and at RESI Boston, five experienced corporate investors will explain how they use early stage device investments to strategic effect.  This panel will cover how medical device entrepreneurs should approach a larger company for an investment or development partnership, and what kinds of investment these major players are currently focused on.

These five panelists will be sharing their expertise with RESI’s audience:

If you’re interested in hearing from these firms on their varied approaches to early stage innovation, you can register for RESI now.

RESI-Boston-2016_v2

Hot Life Science Investor Mandate 1: Family Office Seeking Life Science Investments Globally

17 Jul

A family office founded by a successful medical device entrepreneur can make investments ranging from approximately $500,000 to $100 million into companies and due to its funding structure has no requirements for holding period or capital structure. The firm makes investments in the forms of equity, controlling interest, in-licensing, MBO/LBO, growth capital and is also willing to co-invest. The firm is looking for companies located around the globe and makes around 5-15 investments in a given year.

The firm is looking for companies in sectors of Biotech Therapeutics and Diagnostics, Medtech, Heathcare IT, R&D Services, and Biotech Other. The firm is willing to consider all indications including orphan diseases, though they have some additional interest/experience in areas of Women’s Health, GI, Oncology, Cardiovascular, and Personalized Medicine including Proteomics and Genomics. The firm is most interested in companies that are in Phase II or later, nearing commercialization where the firm is capable of utilizing its operating company to scale up the company’s sales, marketing and distribution. That being said the firm has made earlier stage investments in the past and is open to considering highly innovative and compelling early stage companies. The firm is also interested in companies developing consumables/reagents, service providers, food and nutraceuticals.

The firm looks to work with management teams with experience and grit and generally looks to take a board seat although it is not a requirement. The firm looks to leverage the use of its operating company to assist the company’s sales marketing and distribution efforts as well as providing assistance in operations management.

If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email mandates@lifesciencenation.com

Investor Series: Selecting the Right Kind of PE Partner for your Life Science Firm – Part 2: Growth Capital

22 Jan

By Danielle Silva, Director of Research, LSN

Life science firms may often times find it difficult to select the right kind of private equity fund to partner with during their fundraising process. In order to pinpoint the right private equity group (PEG) to work with, the individuals tasked with fundraising at a life science firm must first gain an understanding of each private equity strategy. Last week, LSN offered an in-depth profile on buyout funds. This week, we shift the focus of our investor series, and take a deep dive into growth equity funds.

Growth equity funds, as their name suggests, supply an injection of capital into firms who are looking to expand or grow their businesses. Life science companies may be seeking this kind of capital in order to finance a major merger & acquisition, partner with a firm that has operational expertise, reduce personal guarantees on loans, or enter into new markets.

So why would a life sciences firm partner with a growth equity fund? Usually, because their business plans have been halted due to lack of available capital. As an added benefit, growth equity funds provide guidance at the board level. This means that one or more members of the private equity group will sit on the management board of their portfolio companies. Furthermore, growth capital funds usually take a non-controlling minority stake in firms, taking up to a 40% equity stake in a firm. This is because they prefer that the current management team continues to run the business.

Growth capital firms sometimes act like venture capital by providing companies with capital that helps them to accelerate the firm’s growth. However, unlike venture capital funds, growth equity funds only invest in established companies that have recurring, predictable revenue streams. For this reason, growth equity funds will not invest in an early stage, pre-revenue company. In the life sciences space, for example, a growth equity fund would invest in a medtech firm that already has one or more devices on the market. On the other hand, they would not invest in a medtech company, for instance, who has a prototype of their product, but does not have any products on the market.

Growth equity funds also vary greatly from buyout funds. Buyout PEGs typically generate revenue through restructuring a business, while growth capital investors hope to achieve returns by growing the business. Buyout funds also sometimes fully buyout a business owner, and thus do not prefer to keep the majority of the management team, whereas growth equity funds typically prefer that the current manager does stay with the firm and run the company.

Growth equity funds also have a much shorter-term holding period for their portfolio companies than both buyout and venture capital funds. Typically, growth equity funds will only hold a portfolio company long enough for their growth plans to be executed, and will then sell the business shortly after this expansion starts generating revenue.

Conversely, private equity funds typically hold businesses for longer time periods because it frequently takes longer for cost-cutting or restructuring measures to make firms increase their profitability. A venture capital fund typically has a longer time horizon than a growth fund because the firm is investing in an early stage company, and it tends to take a long period of time for these firms to become cash-flow positive, especially in the case of firms that are investing in pre-revenue companies.

Growth capital funds often focus due diligence efforts on forecasting the feasibility of the expansion that they are financing, rather than looking at the long-term attractiveness of the company as a whole. The expectation is that profits will be generated through the expansion of the company, and these profits will be used to return the capital that was provided by the fund.

When profits from the company’s expansion are not able to cover the capital that was provided by the growth equity fund, growth equity funds will employ an add-on strategy (similar to buyout funds) which will involve the acquisition of a smaller company, thus making the firm a larger player in their respective industry, with a larger market share. The cash flow that is generated from the company that is acquired can then either be used to increase the percentage of the fund’s equity stake in the parent company, or can be used to return capital to the fund.

Growth capital funds typically exit a company through a merger, or through an initial public offering (IPO). Therefore, because these funds seek to make exits through M&A or through an IPO, they typically work with larger and more established firms. Growth equity funds in the life science sector then, for example, would work with a biotech therapeutics company that currently has at least one product on the market, but would most likely not invest in a company that only has one product that is going through the clinical development process. Growth capital funds, consequently, can be very valuable partners for life science companies that are seeking to retain their current management team and are cash-flow-positive, providing these firms with the capital necessary to grow and expand their operations.

Hot Life Science Investor Mandate 2: Large Family Office Looking for Opportunities in Medtech Subsectors – January 22, 2013

22 Jan

A family office located in the Western US with around $100 million in assets is looking for a compelling opportunity for allocation within the next 6-9 months. The office invested in more than five deals in 2012, typically between $1-5 million per firm.

The foundation is most interested in medical devices, and will look at firms within the full gamut of medtech subsectors. Typically, the office allocates to firms that have at least one product on the market. They have no strict criteria in terms of a firm’s EBITDA or revenue, but require that any firm in which they invest has goals to lower the cost of healthcare.