A US-based venture fund invests only in seed and pre-seed rounds, and focuses solely on opportunities in healthcare IT, medtech and consumer health. The firm primarily invests in U.S. based companies but can invest in any geography.
The firm invests in very early stage companies across the healthcare innovation ecosystem, including healthcare IT, medical devices, and consumer health. The firm is highly interested in preventative healthcare, future of work and healthcare IT applications. The firm is open to investing in any area of medicine, but has specific interest in opportunities in cardiology, pulmonary diseases, diabetes, and women’s health.
The firm does not invest in companies that have already raised over $5 million in dilutive capital. The firm seeks to invest in high quality management teams, and prefers to work with experienced entrepreneurs that have a proven track record in their sector.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
By Max Braht, Director of Business Development, LSN
Pre-pandemic I came across a survey that went out to in-licensors and investors to see from where they sourced their deals. Pipeline databases? Literature? Partnering meetings? Medical conferences? Incoming email solicitations? Website submissions? Warm intros? As it happens, the #1 answer was partnering events, representing the first point of contact for the two parties that eventually made a deal. Even the BioNTech and Pfizer deal came out of a partnering conference in 2013.
However, partnering conferences require a lot of targeted effort in the partnering system to reach out to potential partners and follow-up on the initial outreach. For many early-stage life science entrepreneurs, preparing for a RESI Conference means juggling multiple priorities — investor research, updating pitch decks, team coordination, and most importantly, the execution of your investor outreach strategy.
Many entrepreneurs underestimate the time and effort it takes to identify the right targets, write effective messages, and follow up with these targets consistently. Without a strategic approach, it’s easy to miss out on valuable meetings.
To address this, LSN is introducing a new service: Premier PLUS Partnering, where we do the partnering for you.
Premier PLUS Partnering provides hands-on support from the LSN team to manage your partnering outreach from start to finish.
Drawing on years of experience helping thousands of companies connect with investors, LSN can assist by:
Identifying and reaching out to relevant investors and partners
Crafting consistent, professional messages tailored to each contact
Managing communication and scheduling through the partnering platform
Ensuring confirmed meetings in advance of the conference
For entrepreneurs who know the importance of effective partnering strategies and are interested in taking advantage of Premier PLUS Partnering at RESI Boston September, please reach out directly to the LSN team at sales@lifesciencenation.com or include the add-on in your RESI Boston September Registration.
By Matt Stanton, VP Sales US West, Central and South America, LSN
Longevity Global (LG) and Life Science Nation (LSN) are proud to announce a new partnership to launch a dedicated Aging & Longevity Track at the upcoming RESI (Redefining Every Stage of Investments) Boston Conference this September. This collaboration brings together two leading organizations committed to advancing innovation in healthcare and biotech, positioning longevity-focused startups at the center of global investor and partner engagement.
The Aging & Longevity Track will serve as a curated platform for Longevity Global’s community of founders, researchers, and entrepreneurs to connect with LSN’s expansive partnering ecosystem, including global capital investors and licensing partners. Participating companies will gain access to panels, workshops, educational sessions, and networking opportunities tailored to early-stage ventures across the healthcare spectrum. Longevity Global attendees will also have the option to upgrade to RESI’s renowned one-on-one partnering platform, which allows them to connect directly with strategic partners and capital sources.
“This collaboration gives our longevity ecosystem direct access to global capital and strategic relationships that can accelerate the path from research to real-world impact,” said Christin Glorioso, Founder and CEO at Longevity Global. “The opportunity to plug into RESI’s cross-sector audience while bringing aging science to the forefront is a huge step forward for our mission.”
LSN also views this partnership as a powerful gateway to expand its reach within the rapidly growing longevity sector. “Longevity is one of the most promising frontiers in healthcare, and we’re excited to help emerging companies in this space connect with the capital and partners they need to scale,” said Dennis Ford, CEO of Life Science Nation. “Partnering with Longevity Global allows us to provide a highly curated experience that meets the needs of this evolving vertical.”
About Longevity Global Longevity Global is a mission-driven community and event platform that connects scientists, startups, and investors working to solve aging. As a branch of Academics for the Future of Science, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, LG curates events and programs across San Francisco, New York, Boston, the UAE, and beyond.
About Life Science Nation & RESI Life Science Nation (LSN) is a global partnering platform for every stage of life science companies, offering a suite of tools that includes a database of over 6,000 investors, RESI partnering conferences, and commercialization support. RESI events connect startups with investors and strategic partners across drugs, devices, diagnostics, and digital health.
For more information about RESI Boston September 2025 conferences, contact us at resi@lifesciencenation.com.
One of the biggest challenges startups face when raising capital is simply getting in front of investors. Securing that first meeting often requires significant effort, and when outreach goes unanswered, founders are left wondering: Are they not interested? Are they just too busy? More often than not, the issue isn’t the technology – it’s the messaging. Without clear, concise, and compelling messaging, startups struggle to cut through the noise and grab investor attention.
Over the years, Life Science Nation (LSN) has developed a comprehensive library of educational content to guide first-time CEOs through the complexities of launching a successful partnering campaign. One of the most critical – and overlooked – components is messaging. Investors are inundated with inbound requests, and your company should make it as easy as possible for them to say “yes” to a meeting – ideally just from reading your tagline and elevator pitch. When working with scientist-entrepreneurs, we often go through 20–30 iterations of a company’s core messaging before it clicks. It’s hard work, but it pays off.
Another common pitfall: focusing too heavily on the science. Investors aren’t just investing in technology – they’re investing in companies. A strong scientific story is important, but it must be framed within a broader business narrative. Founders often get valuable feedback during their campaign, but the most successful teams anticipate objections and refine their story before they launch.
That’s why LSN created a structured messaging assessment tool to help companies get a head start. We’ve developed a proprietary questionnaire that, combined with your current marketing collateral, allows our AI agent to evaluate your messaging readiness and identify areas for improvement.
The assessment includes a first-pass tagline and elevator pitch based on our proven messaging criteria, along with an analysis across eight key areas – from management team to competitive landscape – to highlight potential weaknesses in your strategy.
We’re offering this service free of chargeas part of our mission to help startups overcome the hidden obstacles that make fundraising so difficult. Click the link below to fill out the questionnaire – and we’ll be in touch with your personalized assessment soon.
Acceleration of laboratory-based technical and computational cross-fertilization, and ethical and cost pressures on regulatory bodies and therapeutic innovators is driving advancements in preclinical human-based technologies.
Organ (Lab)-on-chip (OoC/LoC)is one of the most striking examples of new translational research technology expansion with ~35% CAGR expected over the next decade (below).
Collaborations between academia and CRO’s are driving improvements in organoid technology for the field of oncology broadly and are expected to improve OoC adoption. Academic innovation using commercial OoC technology is also advancing applications in specific indications in oncology. CRO’s continue to build off established uses in ADME and toxicology to explore R&D applications in oncology space and have even combined organ systems to support elaboration of multiple drug parameters in a single assay.
DEALS
The Tara Biosystems – Valo Health deal is a nice example of how an organ-on-a-chip technology approach has driven collaborations, acquisitions and deals:
Tara Biosystems and GSK collaborate on CV drug profiling (2019)
Valo Health acquires Tara Biosystems for CV OoC platform (2022, ~$75M upfront)
Valo and Novo Nordisk sign CV drug discovery deal (2023, $60M upfront, $2.7B total)
Emulate, TissUse and Mimetas have also been backed by strong big pharma collaborations (AstraZeneca, Bayer, Roche) and funding rounds.
Drug development efforts targeting the constitutive 26S proteosome have led to the development of several important multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle cell lymphoma treatments, including the first landmark FDA approval of Millennium Pharmaceuticals’ (now Takeda) dipeptide boric acid Velcade (bortezomib) in 2003 and second-generation molecules, such as Amgen/Ono Pharmaceutical’s irreversible inhibitor Kyprolis (carfilzomib) and Takeda’s orally available inhibitor Ninlaro (ixazomib). Second-generation versions of these ‘pan-proteosome’ drugs have longer duration of effect, reduced peripheral neuropathy and increased safety in renally impaired patients, but may cause gastrointestinal and cardiac toxicity. This toxicological profile has shifted attention to developing inhibitors selective for an alternative form of the core 20S proteosome—the immunoproteasome, which processes peptides for presentation to CD8+ T cells in the MHC-I complex and is constitutively expressed only in hematopoietic cells, induced in immune cells stimulated in the presence of IFN-γ, and upregulated in certain cancers like MM.
The β1 subunit (particle components beta subunit 6; PSMB6), β2 subunit (PSMB7), and β5 subunit (PSMB5) found in the constitutive 26S proteasome (left) are replaced in the immunoproteasome (right) by the β1i subunit (low molecular mass polypeptide 2 (LMP2)/PSMB9), β2i subunit (multicatalytic endopeptidase complex-like 1 (MECL-1)/PSMB10), and β5i subunit (LMP7/ PSMB8), respectively. Existing inhibitors and their sites of action are indicated. Adapted from https://bit.ly/4kgmQj9
Currently, Kezar Life Sciences’ is furthest along in development; in April, it completed a phase 2a trial in autoimmune hepatitis of zetomipzomib (KZ-616), a small-molecule that inhibits both the immunoproteasome core particle component beta subunit 8 (PSMB8; LMP7/β5i) and PSMB9 (LMP2/β1i). Merck kGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) is also pushing forward with a phase 1 clinical program of M3258, a small-molecule inhibitor specific for PSMB8 and intended for use in MM (Principia Biopharma’s selective PSMB8 inhibitor was swallowed up by Sanofi in 2020 when the pharma acquired the San Francisco-based biotech’s Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor program). Elsewhere, Leiden University startup iProtics recently received a €200K grant from the Dutch Biotech Booster to develop selective immunoproteosome inhibitors, while Auburn University spinout Inhiprot (West Lebanon, NH) received SBIR funding to develop a dual PSMB6/PSMB9 inhibitor for MM. Now, a new study reveals immunoproteosome targeting may also have benefits in neuroinflammatory diseases like multiple sclerosis.
The work, published in Cell and led by Catherine Meyer-Schwesinger and Manuel Friese, from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, identifies a neuron-intrinsic mechanism of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS) driven by the immunoproteasome.
Under healthy conditions, neurons utilize the constitutive proteasome subunit PSMB5 to regulate proteostasis and degrade 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3), a potent stimulator of glycolysis. This degradation is key because neurons rely more on the pentose phosphate pathway than on glycolysis to produce antioxidants like NADPH and glutathione for protection against oxidative stress.
However, Meyer-Schwesinger, Friese and their colleagues show that, during neuroinflammation, chronic exposure to interferon-γ leads to the induction of the immunoproteasome in neurons, triggering the replacement of constitutive proteosome PSMB5 (β5c) with PSMB8 (β5i). This subunit swap in neurons reduces proteasomal activity, resulting in accumulation of PFKFB3, which in turn enhances glycolysis, diminishes the activity of the pentose phosphate pathway, and impairs redox homeostasis — conditions that sensitize neurons to oxidative injury and ferroptosis.
Interferon-induced immunoproteasome markedly decreases proteasomal activity in neurons, leading to a switch in neuronal metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation (left) to glycolysis accompanied by oxidative injury and ferroptosis (right). Source: Cell
The team showed that this mechanism was operational in both experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE; a mouse model of MS) and brain tissue from MS patients. Moreover, neuron-specific knock-out of Psmb8 or pharmacological inhibition using the small-molecule PSMB8 inhibitor ONX-0914 (originally developed at Onyx Pharmaceuticals/Proteolix) protected neurons in vivo from inflammation-induced damage. Similarly, blocking PFKFB3 with the small-molecule inhibitor PFK-158 or through conditional knockout in neurons reduced disease severity in EAE, prevented neuronal and synaptic loss, and reduced markers of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation.
It is important to highlight that, unlike cancer or immune cells, neurons do not upregulate PSMB8 in response to a series of MS-related cytokines. So, the neuron-specific effect reported in this study might only become active upon chronic neuroinflammation (i.e. chronic exposure to interferon-γ). Understanding this mechanism might reveal new targets related to the immunoproteosome in the treatment of MS.
This brings us to challenges for translational efforts seeking to develop immunoproteosome inhibitors against MS. Several important neuronal processes, such as synaptic transmission and calcium signaling, are tightly linked to proteasome function; thus, pan-proteosome inhibitors like Velcade could be detrimental to the CNS. The saving grace of approved proteosome inhibitors is that current chemotypes (boronate-based peptides or epoxyketone-based binders) do not cross the blood brain barrier, at least in healthy individuals. Thus, any MS program might need to use intrathecal injection for compounds derived from existing chemical series or engage a medicinal-chemistry effort to design molecules that can breach the BBB and retain potency.
The gambit for immunoproteosome-selective drugs is that they avoid inhibiting constitutive 26S proteosome activity in most tissues (and non-inflammed CNS), which is what makes Velcade and its derivatives so difficult for patients to tolerate; an immunoproteosome inhibitor should therefore have a more favorable safety profile. But so far, immunoproteosome-targeting drugs have had their own share of toxicity problems in the clinic.
Last October, Kezar abandoned its program for zetomipzomib in lupus nephritis after the FDA placed a clinical hold on the trial after 4 patient deaths. The agency placed a second partial hold on the company’s autoimmune hepatitis trial in 24 patients last November due to concerns about steroid control and injection site reactions in 4 patients who were waiting to roll over into the open-label extension arm. Concerns about compromised immune surveillance of acute or latent viral infections due to hobbled antigen processing and presentation would also need to be explored.
In sum, the new work provides strong evidence that the immunoproteosome plays a key role not only in inflammation or infiltration of immune cells, but also in a metabolic switch in neurons which is a key driver of vulnerability in MS. It will be interesting to see whether either targeting immunoproteosome component PSMB8 or taking a completely different tack, blocking PFKFB3, will prove more practical as a neuroprotective strategy in MS.
A global investor, headquartered in Western Europe with no geographical restrictions, and is actively seeking new investment opportunities. The firm is a specialist biotech investor with an exclusive focus on therapeutics for oncology and genetic diseases. The firm makes selective investments in newly founded or early-stage companies that apply novel science and innovative technologies to bring first-in-class drug candidates to patients. Typically, the firm invests in incorporated companies from seed stage onwards, and it can invest $25-30M over the lifetime of the companies. The firm’s current fund has a core strategy to invest in early stage companies, but the funds will also be used to invest in late stage financings, cross-over financings, IPO’s, and listed stock. These companies can either be portfolio companies or external companies.
In the life sciences, the firm is currently seeking new investments targeting the development of oncology therapies and therapeutics targeting genetic diseases, and is open to all types of therapeutic modalities and all indications relevant to those spaces, including platform technologies. The firm will typically not invest in medical devices or diagnostics, unless as companion to a therapeutic solution. Projects will be evaluated on solid preclinical proof-of-concept (late preclinical stage/pre-IND or early clinical), and will often fund the companies at least up to human proof-of-concept (clinical Phase Ib – Phase IIa).
At its core, the firm only invests in private companies with experienced management teams and breakthrough potential. The firm most often takes the responsibility to be lead investor, alone or in syndicate as the opportunity demands, and wants to be actively involved in the successful development and growth of its portfolio companies. To this end, DROIA has several experts in oncology and genetic diseases, intellectual property, and drug development on the investment team which are available to the portfolio companies.
If you are interested in more information about this investor and other investors tracked by LSN, please email salescore@lifesciencenation.com.
The firm is focused on therapeutics companies and does not invest in medical devices, diagnostics, or digital health. The firm is open to considering assets of very early stages, even those as early as lead optimization phase. The firm considers various modalities, including antibodies, small molecules, and cell therapy. Currently, the firm is not interested in gene therapy. Indication-wise, the firm is most interested in oncology and autoimmune diseases but has recently looked at fibrotic diseases and certain rare diseases as well.
The firm is opportunistic across all subsectors of healthcare. Within MedTech, the firm is most interested in medical devices, artificial intelligence, robotics, and mobile health. The firm is seeking post-prototype innovations that are FDA cleared or are close to receiving clearance. Within therapeutics, the firm is interested in therapeutics for large disease markets such as oncology, neurology, and metabolic diseases. The firm is open to all modalities with a special interest in immunotherapy and cell therapy.
A strategic investment firm of a large global pharmaceutical makes investments ranging from $5 million to $30 million, acting either as a sole investor or within a syndicate. The firm is open to considering therapeutic opportunities globally, but only if the company is pursuing a market opportunity in the USA and is in dialogue with the US FDA.
The firm is currently looking for new investment opportunities in enterprise software, medical devices, and the healthcare IT space. The firm will invest in 510k devices and healthcare IT companies, and it is very opportunistic in terms of indications. In the past, the firm was active in medical device companies developing dental devices, endovascular innovation devices, and women’s health devices.
A venture capital firm founded in 2005 has multiple offices throughout Asia, New York, and San Diego. The firm has closed its fifth fund in 2017 and is currently raising a sixth fund, which the firm is targeting to be the largest fund to date. The firm continues to actively seek investment opportunities across a […]