Tag Archives: writing

Make Your Mark at RESI JPM with the New Company Presentation Track 

12 Nov

By Max Braht, Director of Business Development, LSN

Max-Braht-Headshot

Showcase your brand, services, and expertise to a global life science audience 

Life Science Nation (LSN) is introducing a new opportunity at RESI JPM 2026, the Company Presentation Track, designed for service providers, established companies, and later-stage ventures seeking to elevate their brand visibility and connect with decision-makers across the global life science ecosystem. 

Taking place January 12-13, 2026, at the Marriott Marquis in San Francisco, RESI JPM will also feature three days of virtual partnering on January 14, 19–20. RESI JPM will bring together hundreds of early-stage life science and healthcare companies and over 500 global investors for two full days of partnering, investor panels, and networking. 

The new Company Presentation Track offers organizations a unique platform to deliver a 15-minute presentation highlighting their business, market positioning, and value proposition. Unlike the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge, which focuses on fundraising and investor feedback for early-stage startups, these company presentations are designed for firms looking to expand their visibility, attract new clients, and strengthen their strategic partnerships. 

Participants in this track will have the opportunity to: 

  • Present their company, products, and services to an engaged global audience. 
  • Build brand recognition among investors, partners, and industry peers. 
  • Demonstrate thought leadership and industry expertise in a highly visible format. 

This new feature adds to RESI’s robust mix of investor panels, workshops, partnering meetings, and exhibition opportunities, making it a comprehensive platform for business development and partnership-building across the life science sector. 

Make your mark at RESI JPM. Share your story, elevate your brand, and connect with investors, innovators, and service providers driving the future of healthcare innovation. 

To apply, select Company Presentation during your RESI JPM registration or contact the RESI team at RESI@lifesciencenation.com for more information. 

Register for RESI JPM >>

The Needle Issue #18

12 Nov
Juan-Carlos-Lopez
Juan Carlos Lopez
Andy-Marshall
Andy Marshall

This year’s Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Mary Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell and Shimon Sakaguchi for the discovery of regulatory T cells (Tregs)— white blood cells whose role it is to suppress overactivation of our immune system. The prize was unusual in that Brunkow made her discoveries while leading an industry R&D team at Darwin Molecular (now defunct). Ramsdell and Sakaguchi are also co-founders of two prominent biotech companies developing Treg therapies: Ramsdell’s Sonoma Biotherapeutics is developing autologous Treg therapies against arthritis and hidradenitis suppurativa, together with a LFA3-IgG1 fusion molecule for depleting CD2+ effector T cells; and Sakaguchi’s Coya Therapeutics is developing a low-dose interleukin 2 (IL-2)/CTLA-IgG1 fusion combination for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurodegenerative disorders; the Nobel prize likely helped boost Coya’s announcement in October to raise $20 million in follow-on funding on the public markets.

Tregs have long attracted the attention of drug developers interested in autoimmune conditions, diseases where the immune system is overactive. But progress in this field has been slow, and the first clinical results for T-reg cell therapies are only now beginning to emerge in liver transplantation and kidney transplantation. (Low-dose IL-2 treatments that promote Tregs have also begun to show promise in lupus and systemic sclerosis patients.)

The overarching idea behind Treg cell therapy has been to isolate these cells from a patient, introduce/upregulate expression of the FOXP3 transcription factor that marks them from other T cells, and expand them before giving them back to the patient.

Early attempts to develop this autologous therapy failed in part because Tregs are less numerous in the peripheral blood than effector CD4/CD8 T cells, difficult to isolate and problematic to expand. Moreover, the isolated Tregs are polyclonal, targeting multiple antigens. Approaches that expanded this unmodified polyclonal population of cells and put them back into patients resulted in a ‘diluted’, clinically insignificant, therapeutic effect.

To address this problem, companies are now turning to leverage advances in the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy field. A whole slew of Treg cell therapies is being engineered with CARs or T-cell receptors (TCRs), allowing targeting to specific antigens in specific organs.

As we mentioned above, the most advanced of these are in the organ-transplantation field, where chronic immunosuppression renders patients susceptible to infections that can be lethal. Sangamo Therapeutics’ TX200 and Quell Therapeutics’ QEL-001 are CAR-Treg therapies for renal- and liver-transplant rejection, respectively. These assets, which are in phase 1/2, both bind to human leukocyte antigen HLA-A2, which is exclusively expressed on the transplanted donor organ, ensuring that the Tregs travel exclusively to the place where they are needed. Elsewhere, Sonoma is also developing an autologous CAR-Treg therapy, SBT-77-7101, that targets citrullinated proteins abundant in rheumatoid arthritis (for which Sonoma recently announced positive interim phase 1 data) and the skin condition hidradenitis suppurativa.

A second focus for companies has been on TCR-engineered Tregs. The great theoretical advantages of TCRs over CARs are that 1) they have high sensitivity at low antigen density, 2) they focus exclusively on antigen-presenting cells which then reeducate/suppress effector T cells; 3) they don’t bind soluble antigen and 4) most autoimmune diseases are driven by intracellular proteins presented as processed peptides in the context of HLA. As yet, however, only a few companies are pursuing the approach. One example is GentiBio, which is developing GNTI-122 for type 1 diabetes. This Treg product expresses a TCR targeting a fragment (IGRP 305–324) of the pancreatic islet-specific antigen glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP). Another pioneer in this area, Abata Therapeutics, had also been developing a TCR-engineered Treg therapy (targeting myelin peptide/HLA-DRB1*15:01 for multiple sclerosis); however, the frosty financing environment in the first half of 2025 meant it ran out of cash and Abata closed its doors in August.

One challenge that all Treg cell therapies face is the plasticity of these cells and their tendency to shape shift into effector T cells, a phenotypic change that, in the therapeutic setting, could lower efficacy or even exacerbate pathology. One approach to address this problem has been to modify the cells by overexpressing the transcription factor FOXP3, the master regulator of Treg development. For example, as methylation of the FOXP3 promoter under inflammatory conditions can turn Tregs Into effector T cells, Quell’s Tregs are engineered with a methylation-resistant FOXP3 that compels the cells to remain in their suppressor phenotype. And to bring us back to where we started, Nobel laureate Sakaguchi turns out to be a serial entrepreneur, founding another company, Regcell, that recently relocated from Japan to the US on the back of a $45.8 million financing back in March. The company is using small-molecule CDK8/19 inhibitors that act as epigenetic modulators to lock in FOXP3+ Tregs that show a stable suppressive phenotype in vivo.

But Treg cell therapies still face stiff competition. Ironically, perhaps, from their antithesis: the effector CAR-T cell. Pioneering work by Georg Schett’s group at Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg has galvanized numerous efforts to develop CAR-T depleters of pathogenic B-cell or plasma-cell subsets in autoimmune conditions. Evidence is growing for the clinical efficacy of this approach in diseases such as lupus or myasthenia gravis.

But the holy grail would be to dispense with cell therapy altogether and promote Treg activity in situ, without the need for purification and modification/expansion outside the body. By focusing on injectable biologics, many companies can bring products to market that are easily accommodated into current clinical practice, dispensing with the need for leukopheresis (an approach alien to most rheumatologists) and the complex logistics of ex vivo cell therapy.

Nektar Therapeutics’ rezpegaldesleukin is a pegylated IL-2 given at low doses that acts on CD25, the high-affinity IL-2 receptor enriched in Tregs. The company recently reported positive phase 2 data in atopic dermatitis. Elsewhere, Egle Therapeutics and Mozart Therapeutics have discovery programs developing bispecific antibody Treg engagers for multiple autoimmune diseases. TrexBio has developed a peptide agonist of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2), announcing in June the dosing of its first participant in a phase 1 trial for atopic dermatitis and other inflammatory diseases. Zag Bio is another T-cell engager play that recently came out of stealth,

The Treg field can rightly celebrate its Nobel recognition and the progress made towards bringing this cell type to patients. Although it will likely be several years before we gain a full picture of how Treg biology can be leveraged to fight autoimmune disease, the field eagerly awaits the readout from early efficacy trials of cell therapies and potentially an FDA-approved product for the biologics in later development.

RESI London 2025: Dec 4! See feedback from previous attendees about the UK’s biggest investment conference!

21 Oct

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

RESI London 2025 will be the second year of the UK’s biggest life science investor conference. We expect 250 investors, ready to finance your company. The RESI partnering system allows you to schedule face to face meetings with each investor. See what last year’s attendees are saying!

Testimonials

“RESI London was an extremely productive experience for my company, and the partnering system was so easy to use.”

– Nick Sireau, CEO, Serenatis Bio

“RESI is the go-to meeting for biotech CEOs’ seeking early stage capital. They have built an early stage platform educating founders and bringing capital to them. They are the only people serving this under loved sub sector with such passion.”

– Sunil Shah, CEO, O2h Ventures & Co-founder, O2h Group

“Attending RESI London for the first time was a refreshing and highly positive experience. The event exceeded my expectations in several ways. The atmosphere was welcoming and collaborative, which created a conducive environment for meaningful interactions. What stood out most was the exposure to a unique group of investors—those with a specific interest in early-stage, cutting-edge technologies. These are exactly the type of investors we aim to connect with at Rinri, so the conference provided an excellent platform to engage with individuals who understand the risks and rewards of innovative science-driven ventures.”

– Simon Chandler, CEO, Rinri Therapeutics

“My session was punctual and well-organized. The jury members were thoughtfully selected and provided insightful, constructive feedback that was highly valuable.”

– Christine Ruckenbauer, CBO, RIANA Therapeutics

“I highly value RESI and am grateful for the opportunity both to contribute as a pitch judge, company scouting and the networking opportunities. You have a dynamic network with easy, friendly, professional access. Thanks for all you are doing for the life science and tech development sector.”

– Jill Sorensen, MTEC (Investor)

“As One Nucleus seeks to enable our members to engage with the widest possible investor pool, partnering with RESI London creates a unique opportunity to bring our members into contact with new global early-stage investors to complement the known local investors they meet at all other early-stage pitching events in the UK.”

– Tony Jones, CEO, One Nucleus

“We started this as a grassroots meeting with One Nucleus, and it has been extremely gratifying and rewarding to see our international investors attending because the UK, we know, has some great science that needs to get to the global stage. We are expecting 250+ investors.”

– Dennis Ford, CEO, Life Science Nation

Register RESI London by Friday, October 24 to save £200 on early bird rates!

Register for RESI London Appy to Pitch at RESI London

Make the Most of JPM Week with Sunday Partnering at the Marriott Marquis 

21 Oct

By Max Braht, Director of Business Development, LSN

Max-Braht-Headshot

JPM week is coming fast, and the best opportunities go to those who plan early. If you still haven’t secured a venue or partnering space, Life Science Nation (LSN) has your solution. As the host of RESI JPM, LSN is opening Sunday partnering at the Marriott Marquis, giving attendees an extra day to meet face-to-face with fellow RESI participants or connect informally outside the partnering system before the main event begins.

Sunday partnering provides a head start on the biggest week in healthcare investment, whether you’re scheduling investor meetings, gathering your team, or hosting your own private event. The Marriott Marquis is at the center of the JPM ecosystem, making it the perfect base for receptions, showcases, and partnering tables throughout the week.

If you represent a membership organization, this is your chance to give your members valuable exposure and a convenient home base in San Francisco—without the steep prices other hotels are charging for table rentals. And for product or service providers, sponsoring or exhibiting at RESI remains the most direct and cost-effective way to meet early-stage innovators. Unlike other partnering events, RESI’s community welcomes vendor meetings, and our partnering stats show that clearly.

Life Science Nation is here to help you make the most of the biggest week of the year. Whether you’re planning a private reception, setting up a partnering table, or joining RESI as an exhibitor, our team can help you build visibility, secure meetings, and connect with the early-stage life science community that gathers at JPM each January.

Register RESI JPM by Friday, October 24 to save $600 on early bird rates!

Register for RESI JPM >>

The Needle Issue #17

21 Oct
Juan-Carlos-Lopez
Juan Carlos Lopez
Andy-Marshall
Andy Marshall

On September 24, uniQure reported 36-months positive topline data from the phase1/2 study of their candidate AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. AMT-130 consists of viral vector AAV5 and a synthetic miRNA that targets exon 1 of the huntingtin gene. The results showed that AMT-130, directly injected into the striatum at a dose of 6 x 10^13 genome copies per subject, slowed disease progression at 36 months, as measured by the composite Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale and by Total Functional Capacity compared with a “propensity score-matched external control”.

The results have yet to appear in the peer-reviewed literature, and some experts have urged caution in their interpretation, particularly with regard to the use of external historical control groups and the small number of patients (12 have completed the 36-month period). However, uniQure’s data have been widely welcomed as a breakthrough for a field that has experienced its fair share of false starts (most recently Roche/Ionis halting of its phase 3 dosing of tominersen in 2021 after promising phase 1/2a results). Moreover, the findings have bolstered interest in therapeutic approaches targeting exon 1 in the mutant allele in addition to reducing levels of the full-length huntingtin protein.

Huntington’s disease is a triplet repeat disease in which the huntingtin gene’s exon 1 bears the CAG repeat encoding the polyglutamine stretch that defines the pathology. It’s therefore not surprising that the N-terminal part of HTT and its product have attracted attention as drug targets. Broadly speaking, scientists have tried to get at exon 1 in three ways: targeting the gene itself to block transcription, targeting the mutant mRNA to inhibit translation, and targeting the truncated protein that results from the mutant mRNA. A recent review provides a thorough survey of the preclinical work on these three fronts.

From the drug-discovery point of view, the most advanced programs focus on the development of ASOs or RNAi sequences against the CAG repeat in the mutant mRNA. The motivation behind this strategy is in part the realization that transcription of mutant HTTexon 1 results in a shortened 102 nt mRNA that encodes a toxic protein prone to aggregation: HTTexon1.

To explain what goes wrong in RNA splicing, we need to take a quick detour into the biochemistry of mRNA processing. In any cell, pre-mRNA processing is a competition between the splicing machinery (which removes introns from transcribed genes by recognizing an intronic 5′ splice site, branch point, and 3′ splice site) and the machinery that carries out intronic polyadenylation. Intronic polyadenylation cleaves transcripts within introns and adds a poly(A) tail to the shortened exon–intron fragment transcript when intronic sequences like AAUAAA are present together with a downstream U/GU-rich element.

All of the above is important for Huntington’s because, in healthy brains (specifically the striatum), U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) is thought to sit on the cryptic polyA sites in intron 1 of HTT, blocking intronic polyadenylation and enabling accurate splicing of introns and production of a full-length (9,500 nt) mature HTT mRNA. In contrast, in Huntington’s patients, increasingly long CAG repeats in the huntingtin pre-mRNA are thought to sequester U1 snRNP, thereby interfering with formation of the spliceosome complex and making cryptic polyA sites accessible. The result is premature termination of transcription within intron 1, resulting in the generation of the the shortened 120 nt HTTexon1 mRNA transcript that encodes an N-terminal 17-amino acid HTTexon1 protein.

Until the UniQure program, most disease-modifying therapies in the clinic have sought to downregulate full-length huntingtin and haven’t discriminated between mutant protein and wild-type protein. The prevailing thinking has been that going after full-length HTT makes sense because both the full-length protein—and fragments of it produced by proteolytic degradation—were likely the main problem.

By targeting exon 1, AMT-130 aims to specifically reduce production of toxic HTTexon1. And several other drug developers have also started to pivot and focus more closely on targeting HTTexon1, with the hope that such approaches might have greater efficacy in reducing huntingtin aggregate nucleation.

Just this year, Alnylam/Regeneron recently took ALN-HTT02 into phase 1b testing. This siRNA is conjugated to a 2′-O-hexadecyl C16 palmitate lipid that enables traversal of the blood brain barrier. It targets a conserved mRNA sequence within huntingtin exon 1, leading to the RISC-mediated degradation of all HTT mRNAs. The approach downregulates both HTTexon1 and full-length HTT — and does not discriminate between the wildtype and mutant alleles.

There are other molecules in development that directly target the expanded CAG repeat in exon 1 that are allele-specific. Vico Therapeutics’ VO659 is an ASO with an allele-preferential mechanism of action, targeting expanded CAG repeats in the mutant transcript and inhibiting translation of the mutant allele via steric block. It is currently in phase 1/2a clinical trials, and the company announced positive interim biomarker data in September 2024.

Meanwhile, in the preclinical space, Sangamo/Takeda are developing a mutant-allele selective approach, focusing on blocking transcription of the huntingtin gene using lentiviral vector delivered zinc finger repressor transcription factors (ZFP-TFs) that target the pathogenic CAG repeat. They have shown that their ZFP-TFs repress >99% of disease-causing alleles while preserving expression of normal alleles in patient-derived fibroblasts and neurons. Lentivirally delivered ZFP-TFs lead to functional improvements in mouse models, opening the door to their potential clinical development.

Haystack is aware of at least three other companies developing therapeutics aimed at reducing the toxic effect of HTTexon1, but details of their programs are scarce. China-based HuidaGene Therapeutics is developing a CRISPR-based gene editing product to fix the mutant allele. Galyan Bio was developing GLYN122, a small molecule directly targeting HTTexon1, but the company seems to have ceased operations. Similarly, Vybion has been developing INT41, a functional antibody fragment against HTTexon1, but its current status is also unclear.

It is sobering that over 150 years’ since the first description of Huntington’s disease, which many think of as the archetypal monogenic disease, that we still lack a definitive understanding of its pathogenic mechanism. We don’t know whether the pathology arises from HTT protein, RNA, DNA or some combination of these. And despite the buzz surrounding HTTexon1, most of the data supporting its relevance to human disease still originates from work in mouse models, which recapitulate only certain aspects of the human disorder. That said, raised levels of HTTexon1 are present in patient brain biopsies, with the longer CAG repeats in individuals with juvenile Huntington’s resulting in higher levels of the truncated transcript.

It will be exciting to follow the progress of UniQure’s AMT-130 as our understanding of where in disease progression, and in which patients, this therapy will be most effective. And beyond HTTexon1, other therapeutics targeting alternative disease pathogenic mechanisms are on the horizon. Last month, Skyhawk Therapeutics reported promising phase 1/2 clinical results for it oral small-molecule splice modifier SKY-0515. Elsewhere, broadening understanding of DNA mismatch repair enzymes and the role of somatic repeat instability in the disease have led to investment in a flurry of startup companies focused on this mechanism. That work is now leading to broader excitement that therapies may become available for other difficult-to-treat triplet repeat diseases like Fragile X syndrome, Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and Friedreich ataxia, as demonstrated by the recent deal between Harness Therapeutics and Ono Venture Investment.

Will PubMed be Shutdown? 

15 Oct

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

Many in the life sciences research community were spooked when PubMed went down temporarily in March after the Trump administration cut $4 billion in “indirect costs” that supported medical research. More recently, an ominous message appeared on PubMed: “Because of a lapse in government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed…” Many who use PubMed but not other government websites were probably panicked by this, but a quick look at clinicaltrials.gov, NIH Reporter and even NIH’s main site reveals the same message, while different versions of this message appear on the websites of HHS, CMS, etc.

Still, various EU governments have been quietly preparing for a PubMed shutdown by ensuring they will have a PubMed-alternative just in case. Of course, let’s be real: while they may be able to serve the existing content in PubMed, they will not be able to suddenly support the thousands of additional abstracts and articles added each day, along with MeSH tagging, journal selection, XML/JSON feeds, and other critical functions PubMed provides.

While PubMed is critical to nearly every life science researcher, even those with access to Web of Science, Embase, etc., it is especially critical to early-stage life science companies and investors. For basic research, competitive intelligence, due diligence and more, PubMed is indispensable for those without access to paid literature databases. PubMed is also an important source for pipeline database providers that investors and pharma use to find assets and perform CI.

The US government, for decades, has supplied a critical and reliable literature resource for worldwide audiences, both professional and non-professional alike. With the addition of the first and best clinical trial registry in 2000, continued funding for this resource is paramount for global biomedical research.

How 100% Pharma Tariffs Could Ripple Through Early-Stage Biotech Investment 

7 Oct

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

We have all heard about the recent 100% pharma tariff announcement, applicable mainly to manufacturers or marketed drugs unless they are in the process of building manufacturing facilities in the US. We know that early stage biotechs are generally not counting on investment to take them through manufacturing, for which they will seek a pharma partner. Nevertheless, these tariffs may still have an effect on early-stage biotech investments. Investment in early-stage (seed, Series A/B) biotech is likely to face increased headwinds under a 100 % pharmaceutical tariff regime. The tariff risk exacerbates existing structural challenges in biotech investing.

Overall Expected Effect (Short to Medium Term) 

  • Slower fundraising pace 
    The number of deals may decline, particularly in the earlier stages. Biotech investors will likely become more selective, preferring de-risked assets, strong data, or compelling platforms with clear strategies to mitigate tariff exposure.
  • Higher effective cost of capital 
    Investors will demand more upside or stricter protections (e.g. liquidation preferences, anti-dilution) to compensate for the added risk.
  • Greater emphasis on capital efficiency / leaner burn models 
    Startups may need to conserve cash more, focus earlier on key inflection points, outsource less, and plan fallback strategies for supply chain risk.
  • Longer timelines / delayed exits 
    Because of the risk, uncertainty, and possible delays, the time to IPO, acquisition, or commercialization may stretch, further compressing IRR for investors.
  • Capital flow shift toward infrastructure and enabling technologies 
    Some portion of venture capital may redirect toward bioprocessing, domestic manufacturing, synthetic biology for local API production, supply-chain tools — companies that can help others evade tariff impact.
  • Public market investment in pharma may slow, leading to less IPOs 
    The tariffs could serve to further erode the attractiveness of the biopharma sector for public market investors, reducing the room for IPOs, and pressuring investment taking place more upstream.

In summary, while the recent 100% pharma tariffs certainly don’t have a direct effect on early-stage biotech investing, their dampening effects will nonetheless be felt.