Archive | Redefining Every Stage Investments (RESI) RSS feed for this section

Convention Week: How to Get the Most Investor/Inlicensor Meetings & Exposure 

5 May

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

Prep for the June mega-events in San Diego, BIO Convention and the neighboring RESI, starts now. We’re 7 weeks out and it’s getting warm. In another week, the Heat is On by Glen Frey. Three weeks or so after that, scheduling starts and it’s Hot Hot Hot by Buster Poindexter. Finally, when partnering starts on June 22, it’s the Heat of the Moment by Asia. 80s music references aside, here are the top things you need to do NOW to ensure your company succeeds:

  1. Register. Want to meet investors funding seed through series B and pharma external innovation? There will be over 300 at RESI. Click here to take advantage of RESI early bird rates.
  2. Consider registering to pitch, with many opportunities throughout Convention week. Pitching at RESI puts you in front of a panel of well-aligned investors who are obligated to be interactive and give you feedback.
  3. Log into the partnering system and find your ideal partners. Repeat this every week to account for new registrants. At RESI this is straightforward as the LSN staff populates investors profiles very granularly based on the LSN Investor Database. Investors are carefully vetted. Searching for investors interested in a given modality, disease, geography, stage, etc. is fast. Searching for well-aligned partners in the larger Convention ecosystem can require more oversight (e.g. is an in-licensor looking for early stage, late stage or on-market assets?) Join my webinar to learn the best way to do this!
  4. Open as much availability on your calendar/agenda as possible. Convention week is NOT the time to block the early morning time slots because you want to sleep in 😉
  5. Send customized meeting requests. Meetings are more likely to be accepted if you spend some effort customizing each meeting request to the interests of the receiving company. Join my webinar to learn the best way to do this!
  6. Minimize the number of people from your company who are required to attend the meeting. The fewer people in the meeting the more likely it is to get scheduled (if it’s accepted).
  7. Follow-up on unanswered meeting requests. As someone who’s been behind the scenes running partnering at dozens of partnering events, I can tell you there is a complex series of variables that determines if your meeting request gets accepted. Sometimes it’s as simple as the person who would accept your meeting request did not register until later, even though his/her colleagues registered earlier. That’s why it’s important not let unanswered meeting requests languish indefinitely. Join my webinar to learn the best way to do this!
  8. Cancel ‘dead’ unanswered meeting requests. When you determine you won’t get a response for a given meeting request, cancel it to increase your meeting request allotment. Join my webinar to learn the best way to do this!
  9. When scheduling starts, immediately reach out to the other party for meetings that cannot be scheduled due to lack of mutual availability. You can also try reaching out to the partnering system administrators to see if they can help.
  10. Practice your meeting presentation to ensure everything gets finished in the allotted time. For Convention, 25 minutes is a good guide, as meetings can be far apart from each other. For RESI, 30 minutes as meetings are physically close together. To get between RESI and Convention, plan at least 20 minutes.
  11. Take advantage of virtual partnering. RESI provides virtual partnering during Convention week and the following week. Extend your ROI by continuing the momentum of Convention week into the next week.
  12. Be prompt about your follow-up the week after Convention.

Whew! I’m So Tired (by the Beatles) just writing this, I can’t imagine how I feel after I go through the Convention Week + RESI gauntlet! For more details on how to succeed at Convention & RESI, join my webinar on May 20 for all the best tips and tricks!

Sign Up the Webinar

From Viability to Capital: Financing Risk 

5 May

By Dennis Ford, Founder & CEO, Life Science Nation (LSN)

DF-News-09142022

As part of Life Science Nation’s series on converting scientific innovation into investable signal, the focus now shifts to financing risk. After establishing market need, technical proof, regulatory clarity, execution capability, and economic viability, the next question becomes whether the company can actually secure the capital required to move forward.

Financing risk is where opportunity must become an investable campaign. It is not about whether capital exists, but whether a company can access it in a structured, disciplined way that aligns with how risk is being reduced, and whether the capital required to reach market is a financially viable prospect.

This article examines how companies define capital requirements, link funding to milestone-driven progress, align with the right investors, and build a credible fundraising strategy.

From syndicate formation to campaign execution and timing, this layer of the De-Risk Stack determines whether capital follows signal—or stalls in uncertainty.

Financing Risk

From Opportunity to Investable Campaign

Once a clear plan exists and economic logic is credible, the question becomes whether capital can be raised to support execution at each stage.

Financing risk is not about whether capital exists. There is significant capital available globally for life science. The real question is whether your company can access it in a disciplined and repeatable way that matches how risk is being reduced.

This starts with capital requirement clarity. You need to know how much capital is required to reach the next set of milestones, based on your actual operating plan, not a generic estimate. If milestones are unclear, capital requirements will be too.

Next is the linkage between capital and milestones. Every dollar raised should be tied to the removal of specific risks and the creation of specific signals. Investors are not funding time; they are funding progress.

Stage alignment and investor fit determine which capital you should pursue. Different investors specialize in different stages, risk profiles, and modalities. Misalignment here leads to wasted time and damaged narratives.

Most meaningful rounds require syndicate formation. That means identifying a plausible lead and realistic co-investors, and understanding their incentives and constraints.

Fundraising itself must be approached as a structured campaign, not a series of disconnected meetings. That includes building a sufficiently large and relevant investor universe, sequencing outreach, managing follow-up, and maintaining momentum over time.

Timing closes the loop. Capital must be raised when sufficient progress has been made to justify the next step, but before the company is under acute pressure. Raising too early or too late increases risk and narrows options. Additionally, accepting a bad deal can have a negative impact on future rounds, with potential investors backing out due to unfavorable terms.

Financing risk is resolved when capital follows the systematic reduction of risk—when each round is underpinned by new signal rather than hope.

Core Elements of Financing Risk

  • Capital requirement clarity
  • Linkage between capital and milestones
  • Stage alignment
  • Investor fit
  • Syndicate formation
  • Fundraising strategy
  • Campaign execution
  • Timing

Next in the series: Exit Risk — Defining the Path to Liquidity

Previous Articles:

  1. Technical Risk – From Belief to Evidence
  2. The Problem Is Not the Science: A Seven-Part Series on De-Risking, Signal, and Investability
  3. From Proof to Approval: Regulatory Risk
  4. From Plan to Progress: Execution Risk
  5. From Progress to Viability: Economic Risk

Crossing the Venture Gap at RESI San Diego 2026 

28 Apr

By Momo Yamamoto, Senior Investor Research Analyst, LSN

For early-stage life science companies, securing seed capital is often only the first step. The greater challenge is successfully transitioning from early fundraising into institutional venture rounds, a critical phase where companies must prove not only the strength of their science or technology, but also their ability to deliver meaningful milestones, manage capital strategically, and build toward scalable growth.

At RESI San Diego 2026, this pivotal transition will be the focus of the panel discussion “Crossing the Venture Gap: Moving from Seed Funding to Venture Rounds,” scheduled for 4:00 PM as part of the conference’s investor programming.

This session will examine how companies can position themselves for larger venture rounds in a more demanding capital environment. Panelists will discuss what investors now expect from companies seeking their first significant institutional financing, including the level of scientific validation, regulatory planning, commercial readiness, and operational maturity required to stand out. The conversation will also address how founders can build credible leadership teams and boards, structure capital strategy effectively, and present a compelling long-term vision that aligns with near-term execution.

The panel features an experienced group of venture investors and strategic leaders actively engaged in funding and evaluating emerging life science companies:

Mahesh Narayanan
Mahesh Narayanan

Neuvation Ventures
Nicolas-Cindric
Nicolas Cindric

Yahara Ventures
Preetha-Ram
Preetha Ram

Pier 70 Ventures
Chris-Yoo
Chris Yoo

Xcellerant Ventures
Bob-Sweeney
Bob Sweeney

Global Health Impact Fund
Ole-Henrik-Bang-Andreasen
Ole Henrik Bang-Andreasen

Avant Bio

Together, these panelists bring valuable perspectives on what it takes for startups to successfully move beyond seed-stage financing and into larger venture-backed growth.

For founders preparing for this next stage, the session offers practical insight into how investors assess risk, evaluate progress, and identify companies with the strongest potential for long-term success.

RESI San Diego 2026 provides a concentrated environment for early-stage companies to engage with investors, strategic partners, and industry stakeholders through targeted partnering, educational programming, investor panels, and pitch opportunities. With five days of partnering, access to active investors across the 4Ds, and specialized programming designed around early-stage fundraising and growth, the conference remains focused on helping companies navigate the realities of capital formation in life sciences.

Early bird rates are currently available through May 8, offering discounted access for companies looking to maximize both strategic insights and investor engagement opportunities at one of the sector’s leading partnering events.

Register for RESI San Diego

Allosteric Bioscience: Advancing a First-in-Class Approach to Combat Muscle Degeneration 

28 Apr

By Max Braht, VP of Business Development, LSN

Max-Braht-Headshot

As the global population ages, sarcopenia and age-related muscle loss are emerging as major unmet medical challenges, impacting quality of life, independence, and long-term health outcomes for millions worldwide. With approximately 20% of the global population of 8.2 billion people over age 60, demand for therapies that preserve muscle mass and function is expected to rise significantly.

At the same time, the broader anti-aging market is projected to grow from $73 billion in 2024 to $140 billion by 2034, while the anti-obesity therapeutics market is expected to expand from $16 billion in 2024 to $105 billion by 2030, underscoring the growing commercial relevance of solutions targeting muscle preservation.

Allosteric Bioscience is positioning itself at the forefront of this space with a novel therapeutic strategy designed to preserve muscle mass and function.

Originating from groundbreaking research licensed from Johns Hopkins University, Allosteric Bioscience is developing a small molecule inhibitor of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII), an enzyme increasingly recognized as a key metabolic regulator in muscle degeneration. By targeting GCPII, the company aims to create a disease-modifying therapy capable of addressing sarcopenia at its biological source rather than simply managing symptoms.

Preclinical studies have demonstrated promising results, including preservation of muscle function, inhibition of muscle wasting, and approximately 20% improvement in survival in relevant disease models. These findings suggest potential applications not only for age-related sarcopenia but also for broader muscle-wasting conditions associated with obesity therapies, chronic disease, and other degenerative disorders.

Allosteric Bioscience’s lead candidates are currently progressing toward IND-enabling studies and advancement into first-in-human clinical development. The company’s broader platform also reflects an ambitious strategy focused on optimizing both lifespan and health-span through innovative aging-related therapeutics.

With leadership from Executive Chairman & Co-Founder, Bruce Meyers, and President & Co-Founder, Dr. Arthur Bollon, Allosteric Bioscience represents a compelling opportunity for investors, strategic partners, and stakeholders interested in next-generation therapeutics targeting one of healthcare’s most pressing aging-related challenges.

As longevity science and preventative therapeutics continue to attract growing investor attention, Allosteric Bioscience is working to redefine how the life sciences industry approaches muscle degeneration and healthy aging.

Learn More & Connect

To learn more about Allosteric Bioscience, visit: allostericbioscience.com

To connect directly with Executive Chairman & Co-Founder Bruce Meyers and President & Co-Founder Dr. Arthur Bollon, schedule a meeting here:

Schedule a Meeting with Allosteric Bioscience

From Progress to Viability: Economic Risk 

28 Apr

By Dennis Ford, Founder & CEO, Life Science Nation (LSN)

DF-News-09142022

As part of Life Science Nation’s series on converting scientific innovation into investable signal, the focus now shifts to economic risk. After market, technical, regulatory, and execution risks are addressed, the next question becomes whether the product creates enough real-world value to support sustainable adoption.

Economic risk is where value must become viability. Even if a product works and can be approved, it must still fit within the financial realities of healthcare systems, payers, providers, and patients.

This article examines how companies define and validate their economic case through value proposition, pricing strategy, reimbursement pathways, health economic impact, and competitive positioning.

From proving clinical benefit to demonstrating sustainable commercial value, this layer of the De-Risk Stack determines whether innovation can succeed not just scientifically—but economically.

Even if a product works and can be approved, it must still make economic sense within the healthcare systems that will use and pay for it.

Economic risk is often treated as secondary to clinical and technical considerations. In practice, it frequently determines whether adoption occurs at scale and whether the business is sustainable.

The core question is whether the product creates value that is recognized, fundable, and durable.

This begins with the value proposition. The product must deliver a meaningful clinical or economic benefit that is understood by payers, providers, and health systems. The value must be evidence-based, not speculative.

Pricing strategy must then align with that value while remaining acceptable within system constraints. A product priced far above perceived value will struggle; a product priced too low to sustain the business simply moves risk downstream.

A viable reimbursement pathway is essential. This means understanding existing codes, coverage policies, and benefit designs, and knowing whether the product fits into current structures or requires new ones to be established.

Health economic impact and budget impact analyses translate the value story into system terms. Products that improve outcomes at acceptable or lower cost are easier to adopt; products that create near-term budget spikes can face resistance even if they are cost-effective in the long run.

Adoption economics define why providers would choose this product. That includes workflow impact, revenue implications, and perceived risk for clinicians and institutions. Competitive economics compare the full economic case—including acquisition cost, utilization, and downstream impact—against available alternatives.

Economic risk is resolved when the product creates clear, measurable, and fundable value within the actual economic and budget constraints of the system.

Core Elements of Economic Risk

  • Value proposition
  • Pricing strategy
  • Reimbursement pathway
  • Health economic impact
  • Budget impact
  • Adoption economics
  • Competitive economics

Next in the series: Financing Risk — From Opportunity to Investable Campaign

Previous Articles:

  1. Technical Risk – From Belief to Evidence
  2. The Problem Is Not the Science: A Seven-Part Series on De-Risking, Signal, and Investability
  3. From Proof to Approval: Regulatory Risk
  4. From Plan to Progress: Execution Risk

Partnering Opens April 27 for RESI San Diego 

21 Apr

By Max Braht, VP of Business Development, LSN

Max-Braht-Headshot

Life Science Nation (LSN) is pleased to announce that partnering for RESI San Diego will officially launch on Monday, April 27.

For attendees, partnering is the most important part of the RESI experience. It is where outreach begins, meetings take shape, and the conference starts to turn into real business development activity.

With an expanding group of investors already registered and more joining every day, partnering launch gives attendees the opportunity to begin reviewing profiles, identifying targets, and requesting meetings before schedules begin to fill. The accompanying investor logo splash highlights the breadth of investor participation already confirmed for RESI San Diego and reinforces the value of acting early.

At RESI San Diego, partnering takes place across a five-day hybrid format. Attendees can begin conversations in person on June 22 at the Julep Event Venue in San Diego and continue those discussions during the virtual partnering days on June 23–24 and June 29–30. This structure gives companies more opportunities to connect, follow up, and keep momentum moving after the initial introduction.

For startups, emerging companies, service providers, and investors alike, early access to the partnering platform creates a significant advantage. Companies can strengthen profiles, build targeted outreach lists, and secure meetings with investors, strategic partners, CROs, service providers, and ecosystem organizations before the busiest weeks leading up to the conference.

Beyond partnering, RESI San Diego offers additional opportunities to build visibility and reinforce conversations started through the platform. Attendees can participate in investor panels, workshops, networking receptions, the exhibition hall, and the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge, where companies present directly to investors and receive live feedback.

To help attendees make the most of the platform, LSN will host a partnering tutorial webinar on Tuesday, April 28. The session will provide an overview of the RESI partnering system, share best practices for creating an effective profile, and offer tips for maximizing meeting opportunities before and during RESI San Diego.

Register for the partnering tutorial here: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_BgTWGwKKS4mATlTZVhyoHA

Register for RESI San Diego

From Plan to Progress: Execution Risk 

21 Apr

By Dennis Ford, Founder & CEO, Life Science Nation (LSN)

DF-News-09142022

As part of Life Science Nation’s series on converting scientific innovation into investable signal, the focus now moves to execution risk. Once a company has established market needs, demonstrated technical feasibility, and defined a regulatory path, the next question becomes whether the team can actually deliver.

Execution risks are about the company’s ability to move from strategy to progress. It includes leadership, operational discipline, hiring, partnerships, timelines, and the ability to consistently hit milestones. Even strong science and a compelling opportunity can lose credibility if a company cannot execute against its plan.

This article examines how companies build confidence through clear priorities, realistic timelines, strong teams, and the operational structure needed to keep momentum moving forward.

Execution Risk

From Plan to Progress

With market, technical, and regulatory clarity in place, the question shifts from possibility to delivery: can this actually be executed?

Execution risk reflects whether the company can translate its strategy into measurable progress. Strong science and a well-articulated plan are not enough. Investors are funding the ability to execute under real constraints.

Many companies struggle here not because they lack vision, but because they lack operational discipline. Plans remain high-level, milestones are vague, and capital is deployed without direct linkage to risk reduction.

Execution begins with the team. You need the right mix of scientific, clinical, regulatory, and operational experience for the stage you are in, and leadership that can make decisions under uncertainty. Capability matters, but so does judgment.

Milestone discipline provides structure. Progress must be broken into clear, achievable steps, where each milestone reduces a specific element of risk and moves the company toward a defined value inflection point. A 12-, 24-, and 36-month roadmap ties these milestones together and forces trade-offs.

Operational planning, resource management, and partner oversight determine whether those milestones can be met. Most life science companies depend heavily on CROs, CMOs, and other external partners; selecting and managing them is a central part of execution, not a peripheral task.

Speed and adaptability maintain momentum. Development rarely proceeds linearly. Data will force changes. The ability to adjust direction without losing focus or burning through capital is a defining feature of strong execution.

Governance and structure close the loop. Board composition, information flow, and accountability mechanisms determine how quickly issues are surfaced and addressed. Without this, even high-quality teams drift.

Execution risk is resolved when plans reliably convert into measurable progress and capital consistently turns into risk reduction rather than motion.

Core Elements of Execution Risk

  • Team capability
  • Leadership and decision making
  • Milestone discipline
  • Milestone roadmap
  • Operational plan
  • Resource management
  • External partner management
  • Speed and adaptability
  • Governance and structure

Next in the series: Economic Risk — Defining the Value Creation Opportunity

Previous Articles:

  1. Technical Risk – From Belief to Evidence
  2. The Problem Is Not the Science: A Seven-Part Series on De-Risking, Signal, and Investability
  3. From Proof to Approval: Regulatory Risk