Tag Archives: books

RESI London 2025: Dec 4! See feedback from previous attendees about the UK’s biggest investment conference!

21 Oct

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

RESI London 2025 will be the second year of the UK’s biggest life science investor conference. We expect 250 investors, ready to finance your company. The RESI partnering system allows you to schedule face to face meetings with each investor. See what last year’s attendees are saying!

Testimonials

“RESI London was an extremely productive experience for my company, and the partnering system was so easy to use.”

– Nick Sireau, CEO, Serenatis Bio

“RESI is the go-to meeting for biotech CEOs’ seeking early stage capital. They have built an early stage platform educating founders and bringing capital to them. They are the only people serving this under loved sub sector with such passion.”

– Sunil Shah, CEO, O2h Ventures & Co-founder, O2h Group

“Attending RESI London for the first time was a refreshing and highly positive experience. The event exceeded my expectations in several ways. The atmosphere was welcoming and collaborative, which created a conducive environment for meaningful interactions. What stood out most was the exposure to a unique group of investors—those with a specific interest in early-stage, cutting-edge technologies. These are exactly the type of investors we aim to connect with at Rinri, so the conference provided an excellent platform to engage with individuals who understand the risks and rewards of innovative science-driven ventures.”

– Simon Chandler, CEO, Rinri Therapeutics

“My session was punctual and well-organized. The jury members were thoughtfully selected and provided insightful, constructive feedback that was highly valuable.”

– Christine Ruckenbauer, CBO, RIANA Therapeutics

“I highly value RESI and am grateful for the opportunity both to contribute as a pitch judge, company scouting and the networking opportunities. You have a dynamic network with easy, friendly, professional access. Thanks for all you are doing for the life science and tech development sector.”

– Jill Sorensen, MTEC (Investor)

“As One Nucleus seeks to enable our members to engage with the widest possible investor pool, partnering with RESI London creates a unique opportunity to bring our members into contact with new global early-stage investors to complement the known local investors they meet at all other early-stage pitching events in the UK.”

– Tony Jones, CEO, One Nucleus

“We started this as a grassroots meeting with One Nucleus, and it has been extremely gratifying and rewarding to see our international investors attending because the UK, we know, has some great science that needs to get to the global stage. We are expecting 250+ investors.”

– Dennis Ford, CEO, Life Science Nation

Register RESI London by Friday, October 24 to save £200 on early bird rates!

Register for RESI London Appy to Pitch at RESI London

Confirmed Investors at RESI London 2025 

21 Oct

By Claire Jeong, Chief Conference Officer, Vice President of Investor Research, Asia BD, LSN

Life Science Nation (LSN) is thrilled to announce the confirmed investors for RESI London 2025, taking place on December 4, at King’s Fund, 11 Cavendish Square, with virtual partnering on December 8–9. This premier event connects early-stage life science companies with a diverse array of global investors, facilitating meaningful partnerships and funding opportunities.

Meet the Confirmed Investors

RESI London 2025 will feature a robust lineup of investors spanning various sectors within the life sciences industry. Confirmed investors include:

This diverse group of investors represents a broad spectrum of interests, from pharmaceutical giants to specialized venture capital firms, ensuring that attendees have access to a wealth of expertise and potential funding sources.

Why Attend RESI London 2025?

RESI London 2025 provides an exceptional platform for early-stage companies to engage directly with top-tier investors across the life sciences industry, present innovations to a panel of esteemed judges in the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge (IPC), and receive valuable feedback. Attendees will have the opportunity to expand their network by building relationships with potential partners, collaborators, and industry experts, while also continuing discussions and meetings through virtual partnering on December 8–9, extending their reach and maximizing opportunities.

Whether you’re seeking funding, partnerships, or strategic alliances, RESI London 2025 provides the resources and connections necessary to propel your venture forward.

Register for RESI London >>

Make the Most of JPM Week with Sunday Partnering at the Marriott Marquis 

21 Oct

By Max Braht, Director of Business Development, LSN

Max-Braht-Headshot

JPM week is coming fast, and the best opportunities go to those who plan early. If you still haven’t secured a venue or partnering space, Life Science Nation (LSN) has your solution. As the host of RESI JPM, LSN is opening Sunday partnering at the Marriott Marquis, giving attendees an extra day to meet face-to-face with fellow RESI participants or connect informally outside the partnering system before the main event begins.

Sunday partnering provides a head start on the biggest week in healthcare investment, whether you’re scheduling investor meetings, gathering your team, or hosting your own private event. The Marriott Marquis is at the center of the JPM ecosystem, making it the perfect base for receptions, showcases, and partnering tables throughout the week.

If you represent a membership organization, this is your chance to give your members valuable exposure and a convenient home base in San Francisco—without the steep prices other hotels are charging for table rentals. And for product or service providers, sponsoring or exhibiting at RESI remains the most direct and cost-effective way to meet early-stage innovators. Unlike other partnering events, RESI’s community welcomes vendor meetings, and our partnering stats show that clearly.

Life Science Nation is here to help you make the most of the biggest week of the year. Whether you’re planning a private reception, setting up a partnering table, or joining RESI as an exhibitor, our team can help you build visibility, secure meetings, and connect with the early-stage life science community that gathers at JPM each January.

Register RESI JPM by Friday, October 24 to save $600 on early bird rates!

Register for RESI JPM >>

The Needle Issue #17

21 Oct
Juan-Carlos-Lopez
Juan Carlos Lopez
Andy-Marshall
Andy Marshall

On September 24, uniQure reported 36-months positive topline data from the phase1/2 study of their candidate AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. AMT-130 consists of viral vector AAV5 and a synthetic miRNA that targets exon 1 of the huntingtin gene. The results showed that AMT-130, directly injected into the striatum at a dose of 6 x 10^13 genome copies per subject, slowed disease progression at 36 months, as measured by the composite Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale and by Total Functional Capacity compared with a “propensity score-matched external control”.

The results have yet to appear in the peer-reviewed literature, and some experts have urged caution in their interpretation, particularly with regard to the use of external historical control groups and the small number of patients (12 have completed the 36-month period). However, uniQure’s data have been widely welcomed as a breakthrough for a field that has experienced its fair share of false starts (most recently Roche/Ionis halting of its phase 3 dosing of tominersen in 2021 after promising phase 1/2a results). Moreover, the findings have bolstered interest in therapeutic approaches targeting exon 1 in the mutant allele in addition to reducing levels of the full-length huntingtin protein.

Huntington’s disease is a triplet repeat disease in which the huntingtin gene’s exon 1 bears the CAG repeat encoding the polyglutamine stretch that defines the pathology. It’s therefore not surprising that the N-terminal part of HTT and its product have attracted attention as drug targets. Broadly speaking, scientists have tried to get at exon 1 in three ways: targeting the gene itself to block transcription, targeting the mutant mRNA to inhibit translation, and targeting the truncated protein that results from the mutant mRNA. A recent review provides a thorough survey of the preclinical work on these three fronts.

From the drug-discovery point of view, the most advanced programs focus on the development of ASOs or RNAi sequences against the CAG repeat in the mutant mRNA. The motivation behind this strategy is in part the realization that transcription of mutant HTTexon 1 results in a shortened 102 nt mRNA that encodes a toxic protein prone to aggregation: HTTexon1.

To explain what goes wrong in RNA splicing, we need to take a quick detour into the biochemistry of mRNA processing. In any cell, pre-mRNA processing is a competition between the splicing machinery (which removes introns from transcribed genes by recognizing an intronic 5′ splice site, branch point, and 3′ splice site) and the machinery that carries out intronic polyadenylation. Intronic polyadenylation cleaves transcripts within introns and adds a poly(A) tail to the shortened exon–intron fragment transcript when intronic sequences like AAUAAA are present together with a downstream U/GU-rich element.

All of the above is important for Huntington’s because, in healthy brains (specifically the striatum), U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) is thought to sit on the cryptic polyA sites in intron 1 of HTT, blocking intronic polyadenylation and enabling accurate splicing of introns and production of a full-length (9,500 nt) mature HTT mRNA. In contrast, in Huntington’s patients, increasingly long CAG repeats in the huntingtin pre-mRNA are thought to sequester U1 snRNP, thereby interfering with formation of the spliceosome complex and making cryptic polyA sites accessible. The result is premature termination of transcription within intron 1, resulting in the generation of the the shortened 120 nt HTTexon1 mRNA transcript that encodes an N-terminal 17-amino acid HTTexon1 protein.

Until the UniQure program, most disease-modifying therapies in the clinic have sought to downregulate full-length huntingtin and haven’t discriminated between mutant protein and wild-type protein. The prevailing thinking has been that going after full-length HTT makes sense because both the full-length protein—and fragments of it produced by proteolytic degradation—were likely the main problem.

By targeting exon 1, AMT-130 aims to specifically reduce production of toxic HTTexon1. And several other drug developers have also started to pivot and focus more closely on targeting HTTexon1, with the hope that such approaches might have greater efficacy in reducing huntingtin aggregate nucleation.

Just this year, Alnylam/Regeneron recently took ALN-HTT02 into phase 1b testing. This siRNA is conjugated to a 2′-O-hexadecyl C16 palmitate lipid that enables traversal of the blood brain barrier. It targets a conserved mRNA sequence within huntingtin exon 1, leading to the RISC-mediated degradation of all HTT mRNAs. The approach downregulates both HTTexon1 and full-length HTT — and does not discriminate between the wildtype and mutant alleles.

There are other molecules in development that directly target the expanded CAG repeat in exon 1 that are allele-specific. Vico Therapeutics’ VO659 is an ASO with an allele-preferential mechanism of action, targeting expanded CAG repeats in the mutant transcript and inhibiting translation of the mutant allele via steric block. It is currently in phase 1/2a clinical trials, and the company announced positive interim biomarker data in September 2024.

Meanwhile, in the preclinical space, Sangamo/Takeda are developing a mutant-allele selective approach, focusing on blocking transcription of the huntingtin gene using lentiviral vector delivered zinc finger repressor transcription factors (ZFP-TFs) that target the pathogenic CAG repeat. They have shown that their ZFP-TFs repress >99% of disease-causing alleles while preserving expression of normal alleles in patient-derived fibroblasts and neurons. Lentivirally delivered ZFP-TFs lead to functional improvements in mouse models, opening the door to their potential clinical development.

Haystack is aware of at least three other companies developing therapeutics aimed at reducing the toxic effect of HTTexon1, but details of their programs are scarce. China-based HuidaGene Therapeutics is developing a CRISPR-based gene editing product to fix the mutant allele. Galyan Bio was developing GLYN122, a small molecule directly targeting HTTexon1, but the company seems to have ceased operations. Similarly, Vybion has been developing INT41, a functional antibody fragment against HTTexon1, but its current status is also unclear.

It is sobering that over 150 years’ since the first description of Huntington’s disease, which many think of as the archetypal monogenic disease, that we still lack a definitive understanding of its pathogenic mechanism. We don’t know whether the pathology arises from HTT protein, RNA, DNA or some combination of these. And despite the buzz surrounding HTTexon1, most of the data supporting its relevance to human disease still originates from work in mouse models, which recapitulate only certain aspects of the human disorder. That said, raised levels of HTTexon1 are present in patient brain biopsies, with the longer CAG repeats in individuals with juvenile Huntington’s resulting in higher levels of the truncated transcript.

It will be exciting to follow the progress of UniQure’s AMT-130 as our understanding of where in disease progression, and in which patients, this therapy will be most effective. And beyond HTTexon1, other therapeutics targeting alternative disease pathogenic mechanisms are on the horizon. Last month, Skyhawk Therapeutics reported promising phase 1/2 clinical results for it oral small-molecule splice modifier SKY-0515. Elsewhere, broadening understanding of DNA mismatch repair enzymes and the role of somatic repeat instability in the disease have led to investment in a flurry of startup companies focused on this mechanism. That work is now leading to broader excitement that therapies may become available for other difficult-to-treat triplet repeat diseases like Fragile X syndrome, Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and Friedreich ataxia, as demonstrated by the recent deal between Harness Therapeutics and Ono Venture Investment.

Will PubMed be Shutdown? 

15 Oct

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

Many in the life sciences research community were spooked when PubMed went down temporarily in March after the Trump administration cut $4 billion in “indirect costs” that supported medical research. More recently, an ominous message appeared on PubMed: “Because of a lapse in government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed…” Many who use PubMed but not other government websites were probably panicked by this, but a quick look at clinicaltrials.gov, NIH Reporter and even NIH’s main site reveals the same message, while different versions of this message appear on the websites of HHS, CMS, etc.

Still, various EU governments have been quietly preparing for a PubMed shutdown by ensuring they will have a PubMed-alternative just in case. Of course, let’s be real: while they may be able to serve the existing content in PubMed, they will not be able to suddenly support the thousands of additional abstracts and articles added each day, along with MeSH tagging, journal selection, XML/JSON feeds, and other critical functions PubMed provides.

While PubMed is critical to nearly every life science researcher, even those with access to Web of Science, Embase, etc., it is especially critical to early-stage life science companies and investors. For basic research, competitive intelligence, due diligence and more, PubMed is indispensable for those without access to paid literature databases. PubMed is also an important source for pipeline database providers that investors and pharma use to find assets and perform CI.

The US government, for decades, has supplied a critical and reliable literature resource for worldwide audiences, both professional and non-professional alike. With the addition of the first and best clinical trial registry in 2000, continued funding for this resource is paramount for global biomedical research.

From RESI Boston to Global Growth: Bilix on Winning the Innovator’s Pitch Challenge

15 Oct
Myung Kim
  CaitiCaitlin Dolegowski

Bilix, recognized as a top Innovator’s Pitch Challenge winner at RESI Boston this past September, is making waves in the biotech space with its innovative multi-modality approach to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. In this interview, Myung Kim, Founder and CEO, shares how participating in RESI Boston helped the company connect with key investors, refine its strategy, and advance its clinical milestones.

Hear firsthand how Bilix is driving progress in complex disease treatment and discover how your company can join the next generation of innovators pitching at RESI London and RESI JPM. Applications are now open.

Apply to Pitch at RESI London Apply to Pitch at RESI JPM

How 100% Pharma Tariffs Could Ripple Through Early-Stage Biotech Investment 

7 Oct

By Sougato Das, President and COO, LSN

Sougato-Das

We have all heard about the recent 100% pharma tariff announcement, applicable mainly to manufacturers or marketed drugs unless they are in the process of building manufacturing facilities in the US. We know that early stage biotechs are generally not counting on investment to take them through manufacturing, for which they will seek a pharma partner. Nevertheless, these tariffs may still have an effect on early-stage biotech investments. Investment in early-stage (seed, Series A/B) biotech is likely to face increased headwinds under a 100 % pharmaceutical tariff regime. The tariff risk exacerbates existing structural challenges in biotech investing.

Overall Expected Effect (Short to Medium Term) 

  • Slower fundraising pace 
    The number of deals may decline, particularly in the earlier stages. Biotech investors will likely become more selective, preferring de-risked assets, strong data, or compelling platforms with clear strategies to mitigate tariff exposure.
  • Higher effective cost of capital 
    Investors will demand more upside or stricter protections (e.g. liquidation preferences, anti-dilution) to compensate for the added risk.
  • Greater emphasis on capital efficiency / leaner burn models 
    Startups may need to conserve cash more, focus earlier on key inflection points, outsource less, and plan fallback strategies for supply chain risk.
  • Longer timelines / delayed exits 
    Because of the risk, uncertainty, and possible delays, the time to IPO, acquisition, or commercialization may stretch, further compressing IRR for investors.
  • Capital flow shift toward infrastructure and enabling technologies 
    Some portion of venture capital may redirect toward bioprocessing, domestic manufacturing, synthetic biology for local API production, supply-chain tools — companies that can help others evade tariff impact.
  • Public market investment in pharma may slow, leading to less IPOs 
    The tariffs could serve to further erode the attractiveness of the biopharma sector for public market investors, reducing the room for IPOs, and pressuring investment taking place more upstream.

In summary, while the recent 100% pharma tariffs certainly don’t have a direct effect on early-stage biotech investing, their dampening effects will nonetheless be felt.